Tratamiento artroscópico integral versus artroplastia total de hombro y hemiartroplastia en pacientes con artrosis glenohumeral primaria menores de 50 años
EFORT
Comprehensive arthroscopic management versus total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis younger than 50 years old in: EFORT Open Reviews Volume 11 Issue 4 (2026)
@EFORTnet
Artrosis de hombro en menores de 50 años: ¿Artrosis total de hombro vs. artroplastia de hombro?
Última revisión de #EFORT #EOR: ✅ Artroplastia total de hombro: Mejor alivio del dolor y 92 % de retorno al deporte, pero mayor riesgo de aflojamiento glenoideo. ✅ Artroplastia de hombro: 0 % de complicaciones, mejora la función y retrasa el reemplazo entre 5 y 10 años.
¡La selección es clave! 🔑
Comprehensive
arthroscopic management versus total shoulder arthroplasty and
hemiarthroplasty in patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis younger
than 50 years old – PubMed
Comprehensive
arthroscopic management versus total shoulder arthroplasty and
hemiarthroplasty in patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis younger
than 50 years old – PMC
Comprehensive
arthroscopic management versus total shoulder arthroplasty and
hemiarthroplasty in patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis younger
than 50 years old in: EFORT Open Reviews Volume 11 Issue 4 (2026)
Nabergoj
M, Denard PJ, Collin P, Lädermann A. Comprehensive arthroscopic
management versus total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in
patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis younger than 50 years old.
EFORT Open Rev. 2026 Apr 7;11(4):328-337. doi: 10.1530/EOR-2023-0156.
PMID: 41945567; PMCID: PMC13087880.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario