Smokers Believe 'Silver', 'Gold' and 'Slim' Cigarettes Are Less Harmful
ScienceDaily (Apr. 13, 2011) — Despite current prohibitions on the words 'light' and 'mild', smokers in Western countries continue falsely to believe that some cigarette brands may be less harmful than others. In fact, all conventional brands of cigarette present the same level of risk to smokers, including 'mild' and 'low-tar' brands.
See Also:
A study published in the journalAddiction polled over 8000 smokers from Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the USA. Approximately one-fifth of those smokers incorrectly believed that "some cigarette brands could be less harmful than others." False beliefs were highest among US smokers.
Current research shows that smokers base their perceptions of risk on pack colour, believing that 'silver', 'gold' and 'white' brands are less harmful to smoke than 'black' or 'red' brands. The reason for those beliefs may lie in the history of cigarette branding. Cigarettes used to carry labels like 'light', 'mild', and 'low tar', and in some places they still do. But in over fifty countries cigarette manufacturers are no longer allowed to use those labels because they are misleading. In some cases, cigarette manufacturers simply changed their 'light' cigarettes to 'silver' and 'gold' brands -- for example, Marlboro Lights has become Marlboro Gold. A significant percentage of smokers now seem to equate those colours with low-risk cigarettes.
Smokers in the study also revealed false beliefs that slim cigarettes are less harmful, cigarettes with harsh taste are riskier to smoke than smooth-tasking cigarettes, filters reduce risk, and nicotine is responsible for most of the cancer caused by cigarettes.
Dr. David Hammond, one of the researchers on the study, says that the study provides evidence for further regulation. Said Hammond, "The findings highlight the deceptive potential of 'slim' cigarette brands targeted primarily at young women. The findings also support the potential benefits of plain packaging regulations that will soon take effect in Australia, under which all cigarettes will be sold in packages with the same plain colour, without graphics or logos."
Email or share this story:
Story Source:
The above story is reprinted (with editorial adaptations by ScienceDaily staff) from materials provided by Wiley-Blackwell, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.
Journal Reference:
- Seema Mutti, David Hammond, Ron Borland, Michael K. Cummings, Richard J. O'Connor, Geoffrey T. Fong. Beyond light and mild: cigarette brand descriptors and perceptions of risk in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Addiction, 2011; DOI:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03402.x
Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.
Related Stories
Marijuana Worsens COPD Symptoms In Current Cigarette Smokers (May 23, 2007) — Marijuana worsens breathing problems in current smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), according to a new study. The study found that among people 40 and older, smokers were ... > read more
Cigarette Packaging Still Misleading Consumers Over Health Hazards (July 28, 2009)— New research suggests that current regulations have failed to remove misleading information from cigarette packaging, revealing that a substantial majority of consumers believe cigarettes are less ... > read more
Smokers at Risk from Their Own 'Second-Hand' Smoke (Jan. 30, 2010) — It is well known that smokers damage their health by directly inhaling cigarette smoke. Now, research has shown that they are at additional risk from breathing environmental tobacco smoke, contrary ... > read more'Lite' Low Tar Cigarettes Impair Blood Flow As Much As Regular Cigarettes (May 15, 2007) — Low tar "lite" cigarettes impair blood flow through the heart as severely as regular cigarettes, reveals a new small study. The findings are based on 62 people in their mid 20s, with no evidence of ... > read more
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario