sábado, 23 de julio de 2011

Cancer de pulmon en uptodate n° 1

Aquí la primera Review


Overview of the risk factors, pathology, and clinical manifestations of lung cancer 
 
Author
David E Midthun, MD Section Editor
James R Jett, MD Deputy Editor
Michael E Ross, MD 



Last literature review version 18.2: May 2010 | This topic last updated: May 6, 2010 (More)


INTRODUCTION — Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide for both men and women, causing approximately 1.2 million deaths per year [1]. In the United States in 2010, there will be about 220,000 new cases of lung cancer and 160,000 deaths [2]. In contrast, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers combined will be responsible for only 118,000 deaths.

Both the absolute and relative frequency of lung cancer has risen dramatically. As an example, the age-adjusted death rates from lung cancer were similar to that of pancreatic cancer prior to 1930 for men and prior to 1960 for women (figure 1 and figure 2) [2]. Around 1953, lung cancer became the most common cause of cancer deaths in men, and in 1985, it became the leading cause of cancer deaths in women. Lung cancer deaths have begun to decline in men, reflecting a decrease in smoking [3]. The rise in the death rate in women appears to have reached a plateau, although almost one-half of all lung cancer deaths now occur in women. (See "Women and lung cancer".)

The term lung cancer, or bronchogenic carcinoma, refers to malignancies that originate in the airways or pulmonary parenchyma. Approximately 95 percent of all lung cancers are classified as either small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This distinction is essential for staging, treatment, and prognosis. Other cell types comprise about 5 percent of malignancies arising in the lung.

This discussion will present an overview of the risk factors, pathology, and clinical manifestations of NSCLC and SCLC. An overview of the initial evaluation, treatment, and prognosis of lung cancer is presented separately. (See "Overview of the initial evaluation, treatment and prognosis of lung cancer".)

RISK FACTORS — A number of environmental and life-style factors have been associated with the subsequent development of lung cancer, of which cigarette smoking is the most important. The risk factors associated with the development of lung cancer are discussed in detail separately. (See "Cigarette smoking and other risk factors for lung cancer".)

Smoking — The primary risk factor for the development of lung cancer is cigarette smoking, which is estimated to account for approximately 90 percent of all lung cancers [4]. The risk of developing lung cancer for a current smoker of one pack per day for 40 years is approximately 20 times that of someone who has never smoked. Factors that increase the risk of developing lung cancer in smokers include the extent of smoking and exposure to other carcinogenic factors, such as asbestos.

Thus, the most important aspects of lung cancer prevention are preventing people from starting to smoke and inducing those who already smoke to stop. In individuals who do quit smoking, the risk of developing lung cancer gradually falls for about 15 years before it levels off and remains about twice that of someone who never smoked [5]. (See "Management of smoking cessation in adults".)

Radiation therapy — Radiation therapy (RT) can increase the risk of a second primary lung cancer in patients who have been treated for other malignancies.

In women who receive RT following a mastectomy for breast cancer, there appears to be an increased risk of lung cancer among smokers [6]. In a retrospective tumor registry study of 113 breast cancer patients who had a second primary lung cancer and 364 controls, there was an increased risk of a second primary lung cancer among women who had smoked and received postoperative RT. The risk was more pronounced for cancers in the ipsilateral lung. Similarly, RT for Hodgkin lymphoma has been associated with an increased risk of secondary lung cancer [7,8].

Improved RT techniques limit the dose of radiation to nonmalignant tissue, and contemporary equipment and dose planning is thought to significantly reduce the risk for secondary lung cancer.

Other factors — A number of other factors may affect the risk of developing lung cancer:



 • Environmental toxins — Environmental factors have been associated with an increased risk for developing lung cancer. These include exposure to second-hand smoke, asbestos, radon, metals (arsenic, chromium, and nickel), ionizing radiation, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [4]. (See "Secondhand smoke exposure: Effects in adults".)

 • Pulmonary fibrosis — Several studies have shown that the risk for lung cancer is increased about sevenfold patients with pulmonary fibrosis [9]. This increased risk appears to be independent of smoking. (See "Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias: Clinical manifestations and pathology".)

 • HIV infection — The incidence of lung cancer among individuals infected with HIV appears to be increased compared to that seen in uninfected controls. (See "HIV infection and lung cancer".)

 • Genetic factors — Genetic factors can affect both the risk for and prognosis from lung cancer. Although the genetic basis of lung cancer is still being elucidated, there is a clearly established familial risk. Specific genetic markers associated with the development of lung cancer and its prognosis are discussed elsewhere. (See "Molecular markers in non-small cell lung cancer".)

 • Dietary factors — Epidemiologic evidence has suggested that various dietary factors (antioxidants, cruciferous vegetables, phytoestrogens) may reduce the risk of lung cancer, but the role of these factors is not well established. Attempts to confirm these epidemiologic findings and to decrease the incidence of lung cancer in high-risk patients have not been successful. As example, the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study actually showed an increase in lung cancer among smokers with dietary supplementation of beta-carotene. (See "Chemoprevention of lung cancer".)

SCREENING — The diagnosis of lung cancer is primarily based upon evaluation of individuals with symptoms. Screening for lung cancer is not widely used, since no screening test (chest radiography, sputum cytology, or CT) has been shown to reduce mortality from lung cancer.

Prospective, single-arm observational studies have shown that a large percentage of lung cancers detected by CT screening are early stage tumors, which have a favorable prognosis. However, the apparent survival improvement may be due to the biases inherent with screening. Randomized controlled trials of various screening strategies are underway in the United States and Europe. (See "Screening for lung cancer".)

PATHOLOGY — The World Health Organization classification for primary lung cancer recognizes four major histologic cell types [10]. (See "Pathology of lung malignancies".)

Approximate frequencies of these are as follows [11]:



 • Adenocarcinoma (including bronchioloalveolar carcinoma) — 38 percent (figure 3 and figure 4)

 • Squamous cell carcinoma — 20 percent (figure 5A-E)

 • Large cell carcinoma — 5 percent (figure 6A-B)

 • Small cell carcinoma 13 percent (figure 7A-B)

 • Other non-small cell carcinomas, which cannot be further classified (18 percent)

 • Other (6 percent)

The relative incidence of adenocarcinoma has risen dramatically, and there has been a corresponding decrease in the incidence of other types of NSCLC and SCLC. The increased incidence of adenocarcinoma is thought to be due to the introduction of low-tar filter cigarettes in the 1960s, although this relationship is unproven.

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS — The majority of patients with lung cancer have advanced disease at clinical presentation (table 1). This may reflect the aggressive biology of the disease, the frequent absence of symptoms until locally advanced or metastatic disease is present, and the lack of an effective screening test. (See "Screening for lung cancer".)

Symptoms may result from local effects of the tumor, from regional or distant spread, or from distant effects not related to metastases (paraneoplastic syndromes). Approximately three-fourths of patients have one or more symptoms at the time of diagnosis.

Intrathoracic effects of the cancer — There are a wide range of symptoms due to the intrathoracic effects of the cancer, the most common of which are cough, hemoptysis, chest pain, and dyspnea.



 • Cough — Cough is present in 50 to 75 percent of lung cancer patients at presentation and occurs most frequently in patients with squamous cell and small cell carcinomas, because of their tendency to involve central airways [12,13]. The new onset of cough in a smoker or former smoker should raise suspicion that lung cancer is present. Bronchorrhea or cough productive of large volumes of thin, mucoid secretions may be a feature of bronchoalveolar cell carcinoma and usually indicates advanced disease. (See "Evaluation of subacute and chronic cough in adults" and "Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma".)

Both NSCLC and SCLC often cause a post-obstructive pneumonia. However, bronchiectasis is uncommon because lung cancer usually progresses too rapidly for bronchiectasis to develop. In contrast, slow-growing neoplasms such as carcinoid tumor or hamartoma are more likely to present with bronchiectasis. (See "Bronchial carcinoid tumors".)



 • Hemoptysis — Hemoptysis is reported by 25 to 50 percent of patients who are diagnosed with lung cancer, although bronchitis is the most common cause of this symptom [12,13]. Any amount of hemoptysis can be alarming to the patient, and large volumes of hemoptysis may cause asphyxia. (See "Etiology and evaluation of hemoptysis in adults" and "Causes and management of massive hemoptysis in adults".)

In a patient with hemoptysis, the likelihood of lung cancer varies from 3 to 34 percent in different series depending upon the patient's age and smoking history [14]. In smokers with hemoptysis and a nonsuspicious or normal chest radiograph, bronchoscopy will diagnose lung cancer in about 5 percent of cases [15].



 • Chest pain — Chest pain is present in approximately 20 percent of patients presenting with lung cancer [13,16]. It can be quite variable in character and is more common in younger compared to older patients. Pain is typically present on the same side of the chest as the primary tumor.

Dull, aching, persistent pain may occur from mediastinal, pleural, or chest wall extension, but the presence of pain does not necessarily preclude resectability. Although pleuritic pain may be the result of direct pleural involvement, obstructive pneumonitis or a pulmonary embolus related to a hypercoagulable state may also cause chest pain.



 • Dyspnea — Shortness of breath is a common symptom in patients with lung cancer at the time of diagnosis, occurring in approximately 25 percent of cases [12,13]. Dyspnea may be due to extrinsic or intraluminal airway obstruction, obstructive pneumonitis or atelectasis, lymphangitic tumor spread, tumor emboli, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, or pericardial effusion with tamponade. Partial obstruction of a bronchus may cause a localized wheeze, heard by the patient or by the clinician on auscultation, while stridor can result from obstruction of larger airways.

Pulmonary function testing may be useful in a patient with dyspnea due to lung cancer, as it may show flattening of the expiratory and/or inspiratory flow-volume loop from presence of tumor in the trachea itself (figure 8), from extrinsic compression, or from vocal cord paralysis. (See "Overview of pulmonary function testing in adults".)

Unilateral paralysis of the diaphragm may be due to damage of the phrenic nerve (figure 9). Patients may be asymptomatic or report shortness of breath. In one series, lung cancer was the most common neoplasm affecting the phrenic nerve, although malignancy accounted for only 4 percent of patients presenting with diaphragmatic paralysis [17]. (See "Causes and diagnosis of bilateral and unilateral diaphragmatic paralysis".)



 • Hoarseness — The differential diagnosis of persistent hoarseness in a smoker includes both laryngeal cancer and lung cancer. In patients with lung cancer, this is due to malignancy involving the recurrent laryngeal nerve along its course under the arch of the aorta and back to the larynx [18,19]. (See "Hoarseness in adults" and "Diagnosis and staging of head and neck cancer".)

 • Pleural involvement — Extension of tumor into the visceral pleura is stage T2 and into the parietal pleura is T3. The presence of carcinoma cells in the pleural fluid classifies the lung cancer as M1a (stage IV) in the seventh edition TNM staging system (table 2). Pleural involvement can manifest as pleural thickening without pleural effusion (figure 10). (See "Diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung cancer" and "Tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system for non-small cell lung cancer".)

Patients with malignant effusions are considered incurable and managed palliatively. Although malignant pleural effusions can cause dyspnea and cough, approximately one-fourth of patients who have lung cancer and pleural metastases are asymptomatic [20].

Although a malignant pleural effusion precludes curative resection, not all pleural effusions in patients with lung cancer are malignant. A benign pleural effusion may occur in a patient with a resectable lung cancer due to lymphatic obstruction, post-obstructive pneumonitis, or atelectasis.

In a patient with a pleural effusion, the presence of tumor needs to be confirmed or excluded so that a chance for curative resection is not missed. Series report that 5 to 14 percent of patients with NSCLC and an ipsilateral pleural effusion have resectable disease [21,22]. Surgical thoracoscopy or medical pleuroscopy should follow two or three negative cytologies to further evaluate the pleural space prior to surgical resection of a primary lesion.

Malignant effusions are typically exudates and may be serous, serosanguineous, or grossly bloody. The yield of pleural fluid cytology after a single thoracentesis in patients with documented pleural involvement is about 60 percent, and the yield rises to 85 percent with three thoracenteses [23]. A prospective series evaluated cytologic yield from pleural fluid aliquots of 10 mL, 60 mL, and ≥150 mL [24]. The sensitivity for diagnosing malignancy in the pleural fluid was lower for volumes of 10 mL compared to the higher volumes. Closed pleural biopsy adds little to the yield of cytologic examination. In a patient with a suspected malignancy, repeat pleural fluid cytology with or without pleural biopsy is appropriate if the initial study is negative. (See "Diagnostic evaluation of a pleural effusion in adults".)

During the course of their disease, approximately 10 to 15 percent of patients who have lung cancer will have malignant pleural effusions (figure 11A-B) [25]. The management of patients with malignant pleural effusions is discussed separately. (See "Management of malignant pleural effusions".)



 • Superior vena cava syndrome — Obstruction of the superior vena cava (SVC) causes symptoms that commonly include a sensation of fullness in the head and dyspnea. Cough, pain, and dysphagia are less frequent. Physical findings include dilated neck veins, a prominent venous pattern on the chest, facial edema, and a plethoric appearance (figure 12). The chest radiograph typically shows widening of the mediastinum or a right hilar mass. CT can often identify the cause, level of obstruction, and extent of collateral venous drainage [26].

The SVC syndrome is more common in patients with SCLC than NSCLC. For most patients who have SVC syndrome secondary to lung cancer, the symptoms resolve after treatment of the mediastinal tumor. The pathophysiology and treatment options for the management of patients with SVC syndrome are discussed separately. (See "Malignancy-related superior vena cava syndrome".)



 • Pancoast's syndrome — Lung cancers arising in the superior sulcus cause a characteristic Pancoast's syndrome manifested by pain (usually in the shoulder, and less commonly in the forearm, scapula, and fingers), Horner's syndrome, bony destruction, and atrophy of hand muscles. (See "Horner's syndrome".)

Pancoast's syndrome is most commonly caused by NSCLC (typically squamous cell) and only rarely by SCLC (figure 13A-B). The presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with Pancoast's syndrome due to superior sulcus tumors is discussed in detail elsewhere. (See "Pancoast's syndrome and superior (pulmonary) sulcus tumors".)

Extrathoracic metastases — Lung cancer can spread to any part of the body tissue. Metastatic spread may result in the presenting symptoms or may occur later in the course of disease.

The staging at presentation of patients with known or suspected lung cancer is reviewed elsewhere. (See "Diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung cancer" and "Tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system for non-small cell lung cancer".)

The most frequent sites of distant metastasis are the liver, adrenal glands, bones, and brain.



 • Liver — Symptomatic hepatic metastases are uncommon early in the course of disease. Asymptomatic liver metastases may be detected at presentation by liver enzyme abnormalities, CT (figure 14), or PET (figure 15). Among patients with otherwise resectable NSCLC in the chest, CT evidence of liver metastasis has been identified in approximately 3 percent of cases [27]. PET or integrated PET-CT identifies unsuspected metastases in the liver or adrenal glands in about 4 percent of patients [28,29]. (See "Role of imaging in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer".)

The incidence of liver metastases is much higher later in the course of the disease. Autopsy studies have shown that hepatic metastases are present in more than 50 percent of patients with either NSCLC or SCLC [30,31].



 • Bone — Metastasis from lung cancer to bone is frequently symptomatic. Pain in the back, chest, or extremity, and elevated levels of serum alkaline phosphatase are usually present in patients who have bone metastasis. The serum calcium may be elevated due to extensive bone disease.

PET and PET-CT have improved the ability to identify metastases to many organs, including bone, with greater sensitivity than CT or bone scan [32]. (See "Role of imaging in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer".)

Approximately 20 percent of patients with NSCLC have bone metastases on presentation [33]. An osteolytic radiographic appearance is more frequent than an osteoblastic one, and the most common sites of involvement are the vertebral bodies (figure 16). Bone metastases are even more frequent in SCLC and can be found in 30 to 40 percent of patients (figure 17) [34].



 • Adrenal — The adrenal glands are a frequent site of metastasis but such metastases are only rarely symptomatic. Concern about adrenal metastasis usually occurs when a unilateral mass is found by staging CT in a patient with a known or suspected lung cancer.

Only a fraction of adrenal masses detected on staging scans represent metastasis. This was illustrated by a series of 330 patients with operable NSCLC, in which 32 (10 percent) had an isolated adrenal mass [35]. Only 8 of these 32 (25 percent) were malignant while the remainder had benign lesions (adenomas, nodular hyperplasia, hemorrhagic cysts). Conversely, a negative imaging study does not exclude adrenal metastases. A study of patients with SCLC found that 17 percent of adrenal biopsies showed metastatic involvement despite having a normal CT scan [36].

The lack of specificity of an initial CT identifying an adrenal mass creates a special problem in patients with an otherwise resectable lung cancer. In this situation, PET may be particularly useful in distinguishing a benign from malignant adrenal mass (figure 18) [37]. Other procedures that may be useful in excluding a metastasis include an MRI consistent with a benign adenoma or a negative needle biopsy. (See "Role of imaging in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer".)

Involvement of the adrenal glands is more frequent in patients with widely disseminated disease. In autopsy series, adrenal gland metastases have been identified in about 40 percent of patients with lung cancer [30].



 • Brain — Neurologic manifestations of lung cancer include metastases and paraneoplastic syndromes. (See 'Paraneoplastic phenomena' below.)

Symptoms from central nervous system metastasis are similar to those with other tumors and include headache, vomiting, visual field loss, hemiparesis, cranial nerve deficit, and seizures. (See "Overview of the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management of patients with brain metastases".)

In patients with NSCLC, the frequency of brain metastasis is greatest with adenocarcinoma and least with squamous cell carcinoma. The risk for brain metastasis increases with larger primary tumor size and the presence of regional node involvement (figure 19) [38]. For carefully selected patients, sequential resection may be feasible in cases that have operable NSCLC in the chest and a solitary brain metastasis. (See "Treatment of brain metastases in favorable prognosis patients".)

In patients with SCLC, metastasis to brain is present in approximately 20 to 30 percent of patients at presentation [39]. Without prophylactic irradiation, relapse in the brain occurs in about one-half of patients within two years. Randomized trials have shown that the frequency of brain metastases can be significantly reduced with prophylactic cranial radiation. (See "Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small cell lung cancer".)

Paraneoplastic phenomena — Paraneoplastic effects of tumor are remote effects that are not related to the direct invasion, obstruction, or metastasis.



 • Hypercalcemia — Hypercalcemia in patients with lung cancer may arise from a bony metastasis or less commonly tumor secretion of a parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP), calcitriol or other cytokines, including osteoclast activating factors. (See "Hypercalcemia of malignancy".)

In one study of 1149 consecutive lung cancers, 6 percent had hypercalcemia [40]. Among those with hypercalcemia, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and SCLC were responsible in 51, 22, and 15 percent of cases, respectively. Most patients with hypercalcemia have advanced disease (stage III or IV) and a median survival of a few months [40].

Symptoms of hypercalcemia include anorexia, nausea, vomiting, constipation, lethargy, polyuria, polydipsia, and dehydration. Confusion and coma are late manifestations, as are renal failure and nephrocalcinosis. (See "Clinical manifestations of hypercalcemia".)

Symptomatic patients who have serum calcium of 12 mg/dL (3 mmol/L) or higher require treatment that includes hydration and bisphosphonate [41]. The treatment of hypercalcemia due to malignancy is discussed in detail separately. (See "Hypercalcemia of malignancy" and "Treatment of hypercalcemia".)



 • SIADH secretion — The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) is frequently caused by SCLC and results in hyponatremia. Approximately 10 percent of patients who have SCLC exhibit SIADH [42,43]. SCLC accounts for approximately 75 percent of all malignancy-related of SIADH. (See "Diagnosis of hyponatremia" and "Pathophysiology and etiology of the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH)".)

The severity of symptoms is related to the degree of hyponatremia and the rapidity of the fall in serum sodium. Symptoms include anorexia, nausea, and vomiting. Cerebral edema can occur with the onset of hyponatremia is rapid. Symptoms caused by cerebral edema may include irritability, restlessness, personality changes, confusion, coma, seizures, and respiratory arrest. (See "Manifestations of hyponatremia and hypernatremia", section on 'Hyponatremia'.)

The treatment of SIADH focuses on treating the malignancy. In the majority of patients with SCLC, the hyponatremia will resolve within weeks of starting chemotherapy. Chronic hyponatremia or that of unclear duration may be treated with normal saline infusion to euvolemia, fluid restriction and demeclocycline, or a vasopressin-receptor antagonist. Acute and severe hyponatremia may be carefully treated with hypertonic (3 percent) saline infusion for a correction of 1 to 2 mmol per liter per hour with a correction of not more than 8 to 10 mmol per liter in 24 hours [44]. (See "Treatment of hyponatremia: Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) and reset osmostat".)



 • Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy — Hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthropathy (HPO) is defined by the presence of clubbing (figure 20) and periosteal proliferation of the tubular bones associated with lung cancer or other lung disease. Clinically, HPO is characterized by a symmetrical, painful arthropathy that usually involves the ankles, knees, wrists, and elbows. The metacarpal, metatarsal, and phalangeal bones may also be involved. (See "Malignancy and rheumatic disorders", section on 'Hypertrophic osteoarthropathy'.)

A radiograph of the long bones (ie, tibia and fibula) shows characteristic periosteal new bone formation in patients with HPO. An isotope bone scan or PET typically demonstrates diffuse uptake by the long bones (figure 21A-B).

The symptoms of HPO may resolve after tumor resection. For patients who are not operable, the usual treatment is with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents or a bisphosphonate [45].



 • Dermatomyositis and polymyositis — Dermatomyositis and polymyositis are two distinct forms of inflammatory myopathy, both of which are manifested clinically by muscle weakness. These inflammatory myopathies can be the presenting symptom in patients with lung cancer or can develop later in the course of disease.

In addition to lung cancer, other frequent primary sites associated with these disorders include the ovary, cervix, pancreas, bladder, and stomach. The incidence of malignancy and the role of screening for cancer in patients with dermatomyositis or polymyositis is discussed elsewhere. (See "Malignancy in dermatomyositis and polymyositis",)



 • Hematologic manifestations — A number of hematologic abnormalities are seen in patients with lung cancer. These include the following:

 • Anemia — Anemia is frequent in patients with lung cancer and can contribute to fatigue and dyspnea. As an example, in one series 40 percent of untreated patients had a hemoglobin ≤12 g/dL, while the incidence of anemia was 80 percent in those on chemotherapy [46]. Anemia may be due to any of a number of causes, including treatment. 

(See "Hematologic consequences of malignancy: Anemia" and "Role of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the treatment of anemia in patients with cancer".)



 • Leukocytosis — In one series, tumor-associated leukocytosis was found in 15 percent of patients with lung cancer. Nearly all had NSCLC, and the leukocytosis was thought to be due to overproduction of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor [47]. Leukocytosis in association with lung cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and has also been associated with hypercalcemia [40,47]. 

(See "Causes of neutrophilia", section on 'Secondary neutrophilia'.)



 • Thrombocytosis — Thrombocytosis is common and maybe present in as many as 14 percent of patients with lung cancer at presentation [48]. Thrombocytosis at presentation has been identified as an independent predictor of shortened survival [49].



     -   Eosinophilia — Eosinophilia in tissue or blood is rare, but has been reported in patients with large cell carcinoma. 

(See "Approach to the patient with eosinophilia", section on 'Hematologic and neoplastic disorders'.)



 • Hypercoagulable disorders — A variety of hypercoagulable disorders have been associated with lung cancer and other malignancies. These hypercoagulable disorders include:



     -   Trousseau's syndrome (migratory superficial thrombophlebitis)

     -   Deep venous thrombosis and thromboembolism

     -   Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy

     -   Thrombotic microangiopathy

     -   Nonthrombotic microangiopathy.

These complications and their management are discussed separately. (See "Hypercoagulable disorders associated with malignancy".)



 • Cushing's syndrome — Ectopic production of adrenal corticotropin (ACTH) can cause Cushing's syndrome. Patients typically present with muscle weakness, weight loss, hypertension, hirsutism, and osteoporosis. Hypokalemic alkalosis and hyperglycemia are usually present. (See "Clinical manifestations of Cushing's syndrome".)

Cushing's syndrome is relatively common in patients with SCLC and with carcinoid tumors of the lung, as well as extrathoracic malignancies [50]. Patients with Cushing's syndrome and SCLC appear to have a worse prognosis than patients with SCLC without Cushing's syndrome [50-52]. (See "Establishing the cause of Cushing's syndrome" and "Bronchial carcinoid tumors", section on 'Cushing's syndrome'.)



 • Neurologic — Lung cancer is the most common cancer associated with paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes; typically these are associated with SCLC. Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes are thought to be immune-mediated, and autoantibodies have been identified in a number of instances. The various neurologic paraneoplastic syndromes and their pathophysiology are discussed elsewhere. (See "Paraneoplastic syndromes affecting brain and cranial nerves" and "Paraneoplastic syndromes affecting peripheral nerve and muscle" and "Paraneoplastic syndromes affecting the spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia".)

These diverse neurologic manifestations include, but are not limited to, Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), cerebellar ataxia, sensory neuropathy, limbic encephalitis, encephalomyelitis, autonomic neuropathy, retinopathy, and opsomyoclonus [53].

The most common of these is LEMS, which may be seen in approximately 3 percent of patients with SCLC (figure 22) [54]. The neurologic symptoms of LEMS precede the diagnosis of SCLC in more than 80 percent of cases, often by months to years. (See "Clinical features and diagnosis of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome" and "Treatment of Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome", section on 'Evaluation for malignancy'.)

As many as 70 percent of patients who have SCLC and an associated paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome have limited stage disease [55]. The finding of a paraneoplastic autoantibody in patients presenting with a neurologic syndrome should lead to an evaluation for malignancy. A CT of the chest is indicated in current or former smokers who have a suspected paraneoplastic neurologic syndrome. If the CT chest is negative, then PET may be useful in identifying the location of a neoplasm. Even subtle abnormalities of the lungs or mediastinum require biopsy in this situation (figure 23A-B) [56].

Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes generally do not improve with immunosuppressive treatment. However, symptoms may stabilize with response of the underlying neoplasm to treatment.

SUMMARY — Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide for both men and women.



 • Cigarette smoking is responsible for approximately 90 percent of cases of lung cancer. Thus prevention of smoking and cessation of smoking offer the most important route to decreasing the morbidity and mortality associated with this disease. (See "Cigarette smoking and other risk factors for lung cancer".)

 • Lung cancer is divided into several histologic types. The most important distinction is between non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). (See "Pathology of lung malignancies".)

 • The clinical manifestations of lung cancer can be due to intrathoracic effects of the tumor (eg, cough, hemoptysis, pleural disease), extrathoracic metastases (most commonly, liver, bone, brain), or paraneoplastic phenomena (eg, hypercalcemia, Cushing's syndrome, hypercoagulability disorders, various neurologic syndromes). (See 'Clinical manifestations' above.)

 • The initial evaluation, treatment, and prognosis of lung cancer is presented separately. (See "Overview of the initial evaluation, treatment and prognosis of lung cancer".)

Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement

REFERENCES

1.    Parkin, DM, Bray, F, Ferlay, J, Pisani, P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55:74. 
2.    Jemal, A, Siegel, R, Ward, E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59:225. 
3.    Jemal, A, Thun, MJ, Ries, LA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2005, featuring trends in lung cancer, tobacco use, and tobacco control. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100:1672. 
4.    Alberg, AJ, Samet, JM. Epidemiology of lung cancer. Chest 2003; 123:21S. 
5.    Doll, R, Peto, R, Boreham, J, et al. Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors. BMJ 2004; 328:1519. 
6.    Kaufman, EL, Jacobson, JS, Hershman, DL, et al. Effect of breast cancer radiotherapy and cigarette smoking on risk of second primary lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:392. 
7.    Hodgson, DC, Koh, ES, Tran, TH, et al. Individualized estimates of second cancer risks after contemporary radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer 2007; 110:2576. 
8.    Lorigan, P, Radford, J, Howell, A, Thatcher, N. Lung cancer after treatment for Hodgkin's lymphoma: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6:773. 
9.    Hubbard, R, Venn, A, Lewis, S, Britton, J. Lung cancer and cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis. A population-based cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161:5. 
10.    Travis, WD, Brambilla, E, Müller-Hermelink, HK, et al. Pathology and Genetics: Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart. Lyon, IARC, 2004. 
11.    http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2004/results_merged/sect_15_lung_bronchus.pdf. 
12.    Hyde, L, Hyde, CI. Clinical manifestations of lung cancer. Chest 1974; 65:299. 
13.    Chute, CG, Greenberg, ER, Baron, J, et al. Presenting conditions of 1539 population-based lung cancer patients by cell type and stage in New Hampshire and Vermont. Cancer 1985; 56:2107. 
14.    Hirshberg, B, Biran, I, Glazer, M, Kramer, MR. Hemoptysis: Etiology, evaluation, and outcome in a tertiary referral hospital. Chest 1997; 112:440. 
15.    Colice, GL. Detecting lung cancer as a cause of hemoptysis in patients with a normal chest radiograph: bronchoscopy vs. CT. Chest 1997; 111:877. 
16.    Kuo, CW, Chen, YM, Chao, JY, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer in very young and very old patients. Chest 2000; 117:354. 
17.    Piehler, JM, Pairolero, PC, Gracey, DR, Bernatz, PE. Unexplained diaphragmatic paralysis: a harbinger of malignant disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982; 84:861. 
18.    Ramadan, HH, Wax, MK, Avery, S. Outcome and changing cause of unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 118:199. 
19.    Chen, HC, Jen, YM, Wang, CH, et al. Etiology of vocal cord paralysis. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2007; 69:167. 
20.    Chernow, B, Sahn, SA. Carcinomatous involvement of the pleura: an analysis of 96 patients. Am J Med 1977; 63:695. 
21.    Decker, DA, Dines, DE, Payne, WS, et al. The significance of a cytologically negative pleural effusion in bronchogenic carcinoma. Chest 1978; 74:640. 
22.    Roberts, JR, Blum, MG, Arildsen, R et al. Prospective comparison of radiologic, thoracoscopic, and pathologic staging in patients with early non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68:1154. 
23.    Prakash, UB, Reiman, HM. Comparison of needle biopsy with cytologic analysis for the evaluation of pleural effusion: analysis of 414 cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1985; 60:158. 
24.    Swiderek, J, Morcos, S, Donthireddy, V, et al. Prospective study to determine the volume of pleural fluid required to diagnose malignancy. Chest 2010; 137:68. 
25.    Sahn, SA. Malignancy metastatic to the pleura. Clin Chest Med 1998; 19:351. 
26.    Eren, S, Karaman, A, Okur, A. The superior vena cava syndrome caused by malignant disease. Imaging with multi-detector row CT. Eur J Radiol 2006; 59:93. 
27.    Hillers, TK, Sauve, MD, Guyatt, GH. Analysis of published studies on the detection of extrathoracic metastases in patients presumed to have operable non-small cell lung cancer. Thorax 1994; 49:14. 
28.    van Tinteren, H, Hoekstra, OS, Smit, EF, et al. Effectiveness of positron emission tomography in the preoperativeassessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359:1388. 
29.    De Wever, W, Vankan, Y, Stroobants, S, Verschakelen, J. Detection of extrapulmonary lesions with integrated PET/CT in the staging of lung cancer. Eur Respir J 2007; 29:995. 
30.    Stenbygaard, LE, Sorensen, JB, Olsen, JE. Metastatic pattern at autopsy in non-resectable adenocarcinoma of the lung--a study from a cohort of 259 consecutive patients treated with chemotherapy. Acta Oncol 1997; 36:301. 
31.    Jereczek, B, Jassem, J, Karnicka-Mlodkowska, H, et al. Autopsy findings in small cell lung cancer. Neoplasma 1996; 43:133. 
32.    Cheran, SK, Herndon JE, 2nd, Patz, EF Jr. Comparison of whole-body FDG-PET to bone scan for detection of bone metastases in patients with a new diagnosis of lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2004; 44:317. 
33.    Toloza, EM, Harpole, L, McCrory, DC. Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the current evidence. Chest 2003; 123:137S. 
34.    Schumacher, T, Brink, I, Mix, M, et al. FDG-PET imaging for the staging and follow-up of small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28:483. 
35.    Oliver, TW Jr, Bernardino, ME, Miller, JI, et al. Isolated adrenal masses in nonsmall-cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Radiology 1984; 153:217. 
36.    Pagani JJ. Normal adrenal glands in small cell lung carcinoma: CT-guided biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983; 140:949. 
37.    Erasmus, JJ, Patz, EF Jr, McAdams, HP, et al. Evaluation of adrenal masses in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1357. 
38.    Mujoomdar, A, Austin, JH, Malhotra, R, et al. Clinical predictors of metastatic disease to the brain from non-small cell lung carcinoma: primary tumor size, cell type, and lymph node metastases. Radiology 2007; 242:882. 
39.    Doyle, TJ. Brain metastasis in the natural history of small-cell lung cancer: 1972-1979. Cancer 1982; 50:752. 
40.    Hiraki, A, Ueoka, H, Takata, I, et al. Hypercalcemia-leukocytosis syndrome associated with lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2004; 43:301. 
41.    Thomas, L, Kwok, Y, Edelman, MJ. Management of paraneoplastic syndromes in lung cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2004; 5:51. 
42.    List, AF, Hainsworth, JD, Davis, BW, et al. The syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) in small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4:1191. 
43.    Hansen, O, Sorensen, P, Hansen, KH. The occurrence of hyponatremia in SCLC and the influence on prognosis: a retrospective study of 453 patients treated in a single institution in a 10-year period. Lung Cancer 2010; 68:111. 
44.    Ellison, DH, Berl, T. The syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:2064. 
45.    Amital, H, Applbaum, YH, Vasiliev, L, Rubinow, A. Hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthropathy: control of pain and symptoms with pamidronate. Clin Rheumatol 2004; 23:330. 
46.    Kosmidis, P, Krzakowski, M. Anemia profiles in patients with lung cancer: what have we learned from the European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS)?. Lung Cancer 2005; 50:401. 
47.    Kasuga, I, Makino, S, Kiyokawa, H, et al. Tumor-related leukocytosis is linked with poor prognosis in patients with lung carcinoma. Cancer 2001; 92:2399. 
48.    Hamilton, W, Peters, TJ, Round, A, Sharp, D. What are the clinical features of lung cancer before the diagnosis is made? A population based case-control study. Thorax 2005; 60:1059. 
49.    Aoe, K, Hiraki, A, Ueoka, H, et al. Thrombocytosis as a useful prognostic indicator in patients with lung cancer. Respiration 2004; 71:170. 
50.    Ilias, I, Torpy, DJ, Pacak, K, et al. Cushing's syndrome due to ectopic corticotropin secretion: twenty years' experience at the National Institutes of Health. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90:4955. 
51.    Delisle, L, Boyer, MJ, Warr, D, et al. Ectopic corticotropin syndrome and small-cell carcinoma of the lung. Clinical features, outcome, and complications. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153:746. 
52.    Shepherd, FA, Laskey, J, Evans, WK, et al. Cushing's syndrome associated with ectopic corticotropin production and small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10:21. 
53.    Honnorat, J, Antoine, JC. Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2007; 2:22. 
54.    Elrington, GM, Murray, NM, Spiro, SG, Newsom-Davis, J. Neurological paraneoplastic syndromes in patients with small cell lung cancer. A prospective survey of 150 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991; 54:764. 
55.    Sillevis Smitt, SP, Grefkens, J, de Leeuw, B, van den Bent, M, et al. Survival and outcome in 73 anti-Hu positive patients with paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis/sensory neuronopathy. J Neurol 2002; 249:745. 
56.    Younes-Mhenni, S, Janier, MF, Cinotti, L, et al. FDG-PET improves tumour detection in patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Brain 2004; 127:2331.
 

cancer de pulmon en uptodate n° 2

Overview of the initial evaluation, treatment and prognosis of lung cancer
 
Author
David E Midthun, MD Section Editor
James R Jett, MD Deputy Editor
Michael E Ross, MD 



Last literature review version 18.2: May 2010 | This topic last updated: May 6, 2010 (More)


INTRODUCTION — Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide for both men and women, causing approximately 1.2 million deaths per year [1]. In the United States, in 2009, there will have been an estimated 219,000 new cases of lung cancer and 159,000 deaths [2]. In contrast, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers combined will have been responsible for only 118,000 deaths.

Both the absolute and relative frequency of lung cancer have risen dramatically. As an example, the age-adjusted death rates from lung cancer were similar to that of pancreatic cancer prior to 1930 for men and prior to 1960 for women (figure 1 and figure 2) [2]. Around 1953, lung cancer became the most common cause of cancer deaths in men, and in 1985 it became the leading cause of cancer deaths in women. Although lung cancer deaths have begun to decline in men, the death rate in women continues to rise, and almost one-half of all lung cancer deaths now occur in women. (See "Women and lung cancer".)

The term lung cancer, or bronchogenic carcinoma, refers to malignancies that originate in the airways or pulmonary parenchyma. Approximately 95 percent of all lung cancers are classified as either small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This distinction is required for staging, treatment, and prognosis. Other cell types comprise about 5 percent of malignancies arising in the lung.

This discussion will present an overview of diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of patients with NSCLC and SCLC. An overview of the risk factors, pathology, and clinical manifestations of lung cancer is presented separately. (See "Overview of the risk factors, pathology, and clinical manifestations of lung cancer".)

INITIAL EVALUATION — The three main issues to assess in a patient with a suspected lung cancer are the cell type (NSCLC versus SCLC), the stage of disease, and the functional status of the patient. These parameters are essential for appropriate patient management.



 • Whether a lung cancer is a NSCLC or an SCLC is critical for treatment planning, and a tissue diagnosis is necessary.

 • Staging for NSCLC is critical in determining the appropriate treatment for a patient with resectable disease and avoiding unnecessary surgery in advanced disease [3]. Staging of NSCLC utilizes the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) system (table 1 and table 2 and table 3). (See "Diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung cancer" and "Tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system for non-small cell lung cancer".)

 • Staging of SCLC uses the Veterans Administration Lung Study Group designations of limited (confined to one hemithorax) or extensive (beyond one hemithorax) disease [4]. This distinction is important since patients with limited disease may benefit from thoracic radiation therapy in addition to systemic chemotherapy. (See "Pathobiology and staging of small cell carcinoma of the lung".)

 • Treatment of lung cancer, whether with surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy or a combination of these, can be associated with substantial toxicity. Patients with significant impairment due to their lung cancer or comorbid conditions may not be able to withstand resection or alternatively aggressive chemoradiotherapy. Performance status can be assessed by a variety of methods including the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale (ECOG PS) (table 4 and table 5). The KPS was introduced in the 1940s and uses a 100-point scale and 11 measures to describe patient's abilities to pursue activities and perform work [5]. The ECOG PS uses a five-point scale and has been shown in a comparative study to be a better predictor of prognosis [6].

Diagnostic procedures and staging should be carried out simultaneously, even though it may be tempting to simply pursue a diagnosis when an obvious abnormality is present on imaging. As an example, in a patient with a 4 cm lung mass and mediastinal adenopathy on CT, a mediastinal node biopsy may provide a diagnosis and confirm N2 (IIIA) disease (figure 3A-B). In contrast, a transthoracic needle aspirate of the mass may provide a tissue diagnosis but does not stage the mediastinum. This can lead to the inappropriate assumption that mediastinal lymph nodes are involved or necessitate a second procedure. (See "Diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung cancer" and "Tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system for non-small cell lung cancer".)

NSCLC

Treatment — Surgical resection offers the best opportunity for long-term survival and cure in patients with resectable NSCLC. The appropriateness of surgical resection of candidates with known or suspected NSCLC includes preoperative staging and an assessment of performance status with concurrent comorbidities and pulmonary function to allow prediction of postoperative function.

A patient with lung cancer may be "resectable" by virtue of having a surgically removable NSCLC, but may not be "operable" due to poor pulmonary function or comorbidities. Advances in surgical technique, the role of limited resection, and postoperative care may provide the opportunity for surgical resection in patients who previously might not have been considered candidates for aggressive treatment. (See "Preoperative evaluation for lung resection".)



 • Patients with stage I or II NSCLC should be treated with complete surgical resection whenever possible (figure 4). Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival in patients with pathologic stage II disease and may have a role for patients with stage IB NSCLC (table 1). (See "Management of stage I and stage II non-small cell lung cancer" and "Adjuvant systemic therapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer".)

 • Patients with stage I or II disease who are not candidates for surgical resection or who refuse surgery may be candidates for radiotherapy. Radiotherapy may be applied by conventional means, stereotactic radiosurgery, or radiofrequency ablation. Photodynamic therapy may also be useful as a primary treatment modality in carefully selected patients with superficial airway lesions (figure 4). (See "Management of stage I and stage II non-small cell lung cancer", section on 'Nonsurgical approaches' and "Photodynamic therapy of lung cancer".)

 • For patients with pathologically proven stage III disease prior to definitive therapy, a combined modality approach using concurrent chemotherapy is generally preferred. The role of surgery following chemoradiotherapy is an area of active investigation. Surgery may also retain a role for carefully selected patients with T3 or T4 lesions and negative mediastinal lymph nodes. (See "Management of stage III non-small cell lung cancer".)

 • In patients with clinical stage I or II disease, in whom tumor involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes (pathologic stage IIIA) is documented in the histologic evaluation of the surgical resection specimen, adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival. (See "Adjuvant systemic therapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer".)

 • Patients with stage IV disease are generally treated with systemic therapy or a symptom-based palliative approach. In appropriately selected patients, chemotherapy and/or molecularly targeted therapy may prolong survival without sacrificing quality of life. Radiation therapy and surgery may also be useful for symptom palliation in some patients. (See "Overview of the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer".)

 • Patients with stage IV disease based upon the presence of an isolated metastasis (eg, brain, adrenal) may benefit from resection of the metastasis as well as aggressive treatment of the primary tumor [7]. (See "Treatment of brain metastases in favorable prognosis patients".)

 • Local palliative measures may be useful in patients with uncontrolled pulmonary disease [8]. Dyspnea due to bulky central airway involvement may be palliated by rigid or flexible bronchoscopic removal of tumor using laser for coagulation or cryotherapy. Stenting may be necessary to maintain airway patency and allow external beam radiation. Brachytherapy can be applied locally by a bronchoscopy-directed catheter placement and may be helpful for recurrent or persistent disease in the airway. This approach is usually pursued after maximal external beam radiation. (See "Diagnosis and management of central airway obstruction".)

Prognosis of NSCLC

Stage of disease — The TNM stage at presentation in patients with NSCLC has the greatest impact on the prognosis.

The most extensive data relating stage to prognosis come from a validation series of over 31,000 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database used to validate the 7th TNM staging system (table 1) [9]. Survival decreased progressively with more advanced disease from a median of 59 months for patients with stage IA disease to four months for those with stage IV disease (figure 5). (See "Diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung cancer" and "Tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system for non-small cell lung cancer".)

Clinical parameters — Other clinical factors that exist at the time of diagnosis that can predict survival independent of the disease stage. Most of these factors were identified in studies that primarily included patients with advanced or inoperable NSCLC:



 • Performance status — Poor performance status and weight loss have been associated with shortened survival [10-15]. Reduced appetite, a precursor of weight loss, also has negative prognostic implications [10].

 • Ethnicity — African American ethnicity does not appear to be an independent predictor of poorer survival. Although some studies suggested that African Americans have a worse prognosis even after correcting for stage and treatment, a multivariate analysis indicated that performance status and weight loss account for these results [11].

Pathologic and molecular factors — Older studies of patients with NSCLC have given conflicting results as to whether the distinction between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma affects prognosis [16-20]. Other pathologic factors that have been linked to prognosis in some studies include the degree of differentiation [21,22] and lymphatic invasion [23-26]. (See "Pathology of lung malignancies".)

Each histologic subtype can vary in its degree of differentiation. The impact of tumor differentiation on resectable NSCLC is uncertain. Some studies indicate that poorly differentiated tumors have a worse prognosis than better differentiated tumors [21,22]. However, this finding has not been universal [18].

Lymphatic vessel invasion has a negative impact on outcome [23-25]. In one study of 244 patients who had resected stage I NSCLC, five-year cancer-free survival was higher among patients without lymphatic vessel invasion (74 versus 54 percent) [24]. In contrast, the prognostic significance of blood vessel invasion is uncertain, with only some studies demonstrating a negative impact on outcome [21,22,24-26].

Occult lymph node metastasis (ie, micrometastasis) can be identified by using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to detect tumor markers in lymph nodes from patients with NSCLC [27]. However, such studies are limited by lack of laboratory standardization and reproducibility. The clinical significance of such findings will remain uncertain until long-term studies are reported.

No single molecular marker has been identified that consistently predicts outcome. However, early data from gene expression profiling is promising. (See "Adjuvant systemic therapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer", section on 'Molecular markers' and "Overview of gene expression profiling and proteomics in clinical oncology".)

PET and PET-CT — Positron emission tomography (PET), alone or integrated with computed tomography (CT), is useful in the initial staging to identify sites of tumor involvement. Integrated PET-CT has been shown to improve staging over PET scanning alone [28]. (See "Role of imaging in the staging of non-small cell lung cancer", section on 'Positron emission tomography'.)

A tumor's metabolic activity can be measured using the standardized uptake value (SUV) to assess the tumor uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose. A meta-analysis, based upon 21 retrospective studies that included 2637 patients with stages I to IV NSCLC, found that a high SUV was associated with a poor prognosis [29]. A second meta-analysis, limited to patients with stage I NSCLC, also found that a lower FDG uptake was associated with a better prognosis [30]. PET (or PET-CT) may also be useful in predicting response to chemotherapy [31-33].

Additional studies are needed to establish the role of SUV as a prognostic tool or in predicting the response to treatment.

Recurrence after complete resection — Patients who undergo a complete resection for NSCLC may develop recurrent and/or metastatic disease. Multiple factors influence survival following disease recurrence.

In a series of 1073 patients who underwent a complete resection, recurrent NSCLC was identified in 445 patients (41 percent) [34]. The median time to recurrence following surgery was 11.5 months, and the median survival following recurrence was 8.1 months. Multivariate analysis identified several factors that predicted shorter survival following recurrence. These included poor performance status, disease-free interval of one year or less, prior use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant radiation therapy, and distant metastases (as opposed to intrathoracic recurrence alone).

SCLC

Treatment — SCLC is a disseminated disease in most patients, even at presentation. Thus systemic chemotherapy is an integral part of the initial treatment.



 • Patients with limited stage disease are primarily treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, since the addition of radiation therapy has been shown to prolong survival compared to chemotherapy therapy alone. Surgery is not used except in the rare patient who presents with a solitary pulmonary nodule without metastases or regional lymph node involvement. (See "Thoracic radiotherapy in the treatment of limited stage small cell lung cancer" and "First-line chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer" and "Role of surgery in multimodality therapy for small cell lung cancer".)

 • For patients with extensive stage SCLC, chemotherapy alone is used as the initial therapy. (See "First-line chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer".)

 • Prophylactic radiation has been shown to decrease the incidence of brain metastases and prolong survival in patients with both limited and extensive stage SCLC who respond to their initial treatment. (See "Prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with small cell lung cancer".)

Prognosis — The most important prognostic factor in patients with lung cancer is the stage of disease at presentation. The primary determinant of survival in patients with SCLC is the extent of disease at presentation. For patients with limited stage disease, median survivals range from 15 to 20 months, and the reported five-year survival rate is 10 to 13 percent. In contrast, for patients with extended stage disease, the median survival is 8 to 13 months, and the five-year survival rate is 1 to 2 percent. (See "First-line chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer", section on 'Benefit of therapy'.)

Clinical parameters also have prognostic importance in patients with SCLC [15]. Poor performance status and/or weight loss have been associated with shortened survival.

SIDE EFFECTS OF TREATMENT — Both curative and palliative treatment of lung cancer often involve multimodality approaches that may include surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy or molecularly targeted agents. (See 'SCLC' above.)

The side effects of systemic therapy are often of particular concern, because of their potential negative effects on quality of life both during and after treatment. The toxicities will vary depending upon the therapeutic regimen.

Common toxicities observed in patients being treated for lung cancer include the following:



 • Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting of variable severity may be seen with most chemotherapy regimens (table 6), but can usually be prevented or managed effectively with aggressive therapy. (See "Pathophysiology and prediction of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting" and "Prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting".)

 • Hematologic toxicity, including in particular anemia and neutropenia with an increased risk of infection, is seen with most cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. (See "Hematologic consequences of malignancy: Anemia".)

 • Nephrotoxicity, especially with chemotherapy regimens containing cisplatin, can be severe. Intensive hydration is required to prevent this complication. (See "Cisplatin nephrotoxicity".)

 • Neurotoxicity, which is especially frequent with cisplatin and the taxanes (paclitaxel, docetaxel), is usually at least partially reversible after therapy is discontinued. (See "Neurologic complications of non-platinum cancer chemotherapy" and "Neurologic complications of platinum-based chemotherapy".)

 • Cutaneous toxicity, manifested as an acneiform rash, is frequent with erlotinib and gefitinib. Although this side effect is troublesome, the presence of a rash is correlated with a response to therapy. (See "Cutaneous complications of molecularly targeted therapy and other biologic agents used for cancer therapy", section on 'EGFR signal transduction inhibitors' and "Small molecule epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer".)

 • Fatigue is frequent and may be due to systemic chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or the cancer itself. (See "Cancer-related fatigue: Prevalence, screening and clinical assessment".)

 • Anorexia and weight loss are common in patients with lung cancer, and may be due to the disease or its treatment. (See "Clinical features and pathogenesis of cancer cachexia" and "Pharmacologic management of cancer anorexia/cachexia".)

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS — Educational materials on this topic are available for patients. (See "Patient information: Lung cancer risks, symptoms, and diagnosis".) We encourage you to print or e-mail this topic, or to refer patients to our public web site www.uptodate.com/patients, which includes this and other topics.

SUMMARY — Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide for both men and women.



 • The initial stage in management is to assess whether the patient has a NSCLC or a SCLC, the stage of the disease, and the overall performance status of the patient. (See 'Initial evaluation' above.)

 • For patients with NSCLC, management is largely determined by the stage of disease. For patients with early stage disease, surgical resection offers the best opportunity for cure, while concurrent chemoradiotherapy is preferred for those with more extensive intrathoracic disease. In contrast, patients with advanced disease are managed palliatively with systemic therapy and/or local palliative modalities. (See 'NSCLC' above.)

 • For patients with SCLC, systemic chemotherapy is an important component of treatment, because SCLC is disseminated at presentation in almost all patients. For those with limited stage disease, thoracic radiation therapy is used in combination with chemotherapy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation is often used to decrease the incidence of brain metastases and prolong survival. (See 'SCLC' above.)

Use of UpToDate is subject to the Subscription and License Agreement

REFERENCES

1.    Parkin, DM, Bray, F, Ferlay, J, Pisani, P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55:74. 
2.    Jemal, A, Siegel, R, Ward, E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59:225. 
3.    Silvestri, GA, Tanoue, LT, Margolis, ML, et al. The noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: the guidelines. Chest 2003; 123:147S. 
4.    Havemann, K, Hirsch, FR, Ihde, DC, et al. Staging and prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: a consensus report. Lung Cancer 1989; 5:119. 
5.    Karnofsky, D, Abelmann, W, Craver, L, Burchenal, J. The use of nitrogen mustard in the palliative treatment of cancer. Cancer 1948; 1:634. 
6.    Buccheri, G, Ferrigno, D, Tamburini, M. Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: a prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution. Eur J Cancer 1996; 32A:1135. 
7.    Tanvetyanon, T, Robinson, LA, Schell, MJ, et al. Outcomes of adrenalectomy for isolated synchronous versus metachronous adrenal metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:1142. 
8.    Kvale, PA, Simoff, M, Prakash, UB. Lung cancer. Palliative care. Chest 2003; 123:284S. 
9.    Groome, PA, Bolejack, V, Crowley, JJ, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: validation of the proposals for revision of the T, N, and M descriptors and consequent stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol 2007; 2:694. 
10.    Hoang, T, Xu, R, Schiller, JH, et al. Clinical model to predict survival in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with third-generation chemotherapy regimens based on eastern cooperative oncology group data. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:175. 
11.    Blackstock, AW, Herndon JE, 2nd, Paskett, ED, et al. Outcomes among African-American/non-African-American patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma: report from the cancer and leukemia group B. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94:284. 
12.    Stanley, KE. Prognostic factors for survival in patients with inoperable lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1980; 65:25. 
13.    Feinstein, AR. Symptomatic patterns, biologic behavior, and prognosis in cancer of the lung. Practical application of boolean algebra and clinical taxonomy. Ann Intern Med 1964; 61:27. 
14.    Kawaguchi, T, Takada, M, Kubo, A, et al. Performance status and smoking status are independent favorable prognostic factors for survival in non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive analysis of 26,957 patients with NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2010; 5:620. 
15.    Sculier, JP, Chansky, K, Crowley, JJ, et al. The impact of additional prognostic factors on survival and their relationship with the anatomical extent of disease expressed by the 6th Edition of the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors and the proposals for the 7th Edition. J Thorac Oncol 2008; 3:457. 
16.    Gail, MH, Eagan, RT, Feld, R, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with resected stage I NSCLC: a report from the Lung Cancer Study Group. Cancer 1984; 54:1802. 
17.    Postoperative T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Squamous versus nonsquamous recurrences. The Lung Cancer Study Group. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987; 94:349. 
18.    Harpole, DH Jr, Herndon JE, 2nd, Young, WG Jr, et al. Stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer. A multivariate analysis of treatment methods and patterns of recurrence. Cancer 1995; 76:787. 
19.    Pairolero, PC, Williams, DE, Bergstralh, EJ, et al. Postsurgical stage I bronchogenic carcinoma: morbid implications of recurrent disease. Ann Thorac Surg 1984; 38:331. 
20.    Martini, N, Bains, MS, Burt, ME, et al. Incidence of local recurrence and second primary tumors in resected stage I lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109:120. 
21.    Lipford III, EH, Eggleston, JC, Lillemoe, KD, et al. Prognostic factors in surgically resected limited-stage, nonsmall cell carcinoma of the lung. Am J Surg Pathol 1984; 8:357. 
22.    Takise, A, Kodama, T, Shimosato, Y, et al. Histopathologic prognostic factors in adenocarcinomas of the peripheral lung less than 2 cm in diameter. Cancer 1988; 61:2083. 
23.    Cagini, L, Monacelli, M, Giustozzi, G, et al. Biological prognostic factors for early stage completely resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Surg Oncol 2000; 74:53. 
24.    Kwiatkowski, DJ, Harpole, DH Jr, Godleski, J, et al. Molecular pathologic substaging in 244 stage I non-small-cell lung cancer patients: clinical implications. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:2468. 
25.    Shields, TW. Prognostic significance of parenchymal lymphatic vessel and blood vessel invasion in carcinoma of the lung. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983; 157:185. 
26.    Macchiarini, P, Fontanini, G, Hardin, MJ, et al. Blood vessel invasion by tumor cells predicts recurrence in completely resected T1 N0 M0 non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 106:80. 
27.    Xi, L, Coello, MC, Litle, VR, et al. A combination of molecular markers accurately detects lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12:2484. 
28.    De Wever, W, Ceyssens, S, Mortelmans, L, et al. Additional value of PET-CT in the staging of lung cancer: comparison with CT alone, PET alone and visual correlation of PET and CT. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:23. 
29.    Paesmans, M, Berghmans, T, Dusart, M, et al. Primary tumor standardized uptake value measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer: update of a systematic review and meta-analysis by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project. J Thorac Oncol 2010; 5:612. 
30.    Nair, VS, Krupitskaya, Y, Gould, MK. Positron emission tomography 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and prognosis in patients with surgically treated, stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. J Thorac Oncol 2009; 4:1473. 
31.    Lowe, VJ, Hoffman, JM, DeLong, DM, et al. Semiquantitative and visual analysis of FDG-PET images in patients with pulmonary abnormalities. J Nucl Med 1994; 35:1771. 
32.    Pottgen, C, Levegrun, S, Theegarten, D, et al. Value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer for prediction of pathologic response and times to relapse after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12:97. 
33.    Hoekstra, CJ, Stroobants, SG, Smit, EF, et al. Prognostic relevance of response evaluation using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:8362. 
34.    Sugimura, H, Nichols, FC, Yang, P, et al. Survival after recurrent nonsmall-cell lung cancer after complete pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83:409. 
 
 
 
© 2010 UpToDate, Inc. All rights reserved. | Subscription and License Agreement
Licensed to: KD KD
 

Genética y la enfermedad de Parkinson: Revisión de actualidades

Leer en: English
Descargar PDF en: Español

Resumen

La Enfermedad de Parkinson (EP) se define como un desorden neurodegenerativo que surge como resultado de la pérdida de células dopaminérgicas en la sustancia pars nigra compacta. Clínicamente, la EP se caracteriza por temblor en reposo, rigidez, bradicinesia e inestabilidad postural. La EP es la forma más frecuente de parkinsonismo y el segundo desorden neurodegenerativo más frecuente, después de la enfermedad de Alzheimer. Se estima que la EP afecta de 1% a 3% de la población mayor de 60 años. La incidencia en general es de 13.4 por 100 000 personas. La EP es una enfermedad con etiología compleja en la que se requiere del efecto aditivo de factores genéticos y ambientales. A pesar de que existen formas monogénicas, se cree que la gran mayoría de los casos se deben a causas multifactoriales. Más de 10 loci han sido relacionados con la EP y se han logrado definir patrones de herencia dominantes y recesivos según el gen implicado así como el cuadro clínico asociado. Este conocimiento ha permitido mayor comprensión acerca de la fisiopatología del padecimiento explicando la existencia de daño neuronal, muerte de neuronas dopaminérgicas, daño por estrés oxidativo, daño por acumulación de sustancias tóxicas, entre otras. Aun así, los conocimientos genéticos actuales permiten explicar poco menos de 10% de todos los casos de EP y es por eso de gran importancia brindar asesoramiento genético individualizado tanto al paciente como a sus familiares. La genética médica proporciona un campo amplio de investigación al respecto de esta enfermedad neurodegenerativa, no sólo para una mejor comprensión de su patogenia sino para elucidar vías terapéuticas más eficientes y de mejor beneficio para los pacientes con EP.
Palabras clave Enfermedad de Parkinson, herencia compleja, genética, México.

Identidad aumentada y madurez como internautas: somos auténticos en las redes sociales


El caparazón: Identidad aumentada y madurez como internautas: somos auténticos en las redes sociales

Link to El caparazon


Posted: 22 Jul 2011 11:03 PM PDT
Escribiendo sobre autenticidad encuentro la investigación que os presento hoy.
Se supone muchas veces que los perfiles en redes sociales crean y comunican una imagen idealizada de nosotros mismos (Manago, Graham, Greenfield, & Salimkhan, 2008), que de algún modo fingimos en internet lo que no somos.  De acuerdo con esta hipótesis sobre la identidad virtual idealizada, los propietarios de perfiles reflejan características idealizadas, que no reflejarían sus personalidades reales.
La visión alternativa defiende que sí reflejamos nuestras verdaderas identidades en internet, que  las redes sociales constituyen ya parte de nuestro contexto social extendido en el que expresar características de personalidad reales, capaces de transmitir percepciones interpersonales que lo que menos queremos es que lleven a cualquier tipo de engaño.
De hecho, lo que se transmite en redes sociales es una integración de varias fuentes de información personal similares (o incluso más reveladoras) a las que compartimos en el mundo no virtual: pensamientos privados, imágenes de la cara, relatos de nuestro comportamiento social,  cosas que contienen información válida acerca de nuestra personalidad. (Ambady & Skowronski, 2008; Funder, 1999; Hall & Bernieri, 2001; Kenny, 1994; Vazire & Gosling, 2004).
Esta sería la conclusión del estudio, lógica y que concuerda con algunas intuiciones al respecto:
-Es difícil crear identidades idealizadas en el estado  actual de la web social, sobre todo si recordamos que no somos los dueños exclusivos de esta, que como dice Bauman, «La construcción de identidad implica el triple desafío (y riesgo) de confiar en uno mismo, en otros y también en la sociedad.».
-La propia relación que establecemos en internet, donde no nos vemos las caras, donde la confianza, elemento esencial en el que basar nuestros juicios y decisiones debe traducirse a lo virtual, provoca que exijamos responsabilidad sobre sus perfiles a nuestros contactos, que además pueden conversar, interactuar con nuestras auto-definiciones para también ajustarlas a la realidad.
Como escribía hace un tiempo en Cyborgs en Las Ramblas:
“el carácter textual de la comunicación en red aporta sentimientos de seguridad, de palabras que no se lleva el viento. En este tipo de interacciones, dadas las posibilidades para registrar conversaciones, se activan en mayor medida expectativas y auto exigencias de temas como la coherencia o la autenticidad de lo comunicado.
El hecho de comunicar por escrito nos confronta con cosas de nosotros mismos que no conocíamos, nos obliga y facilita (sobretodo en la comunicación asíncrona) la introspección, otra vez la coherencia, facilitando la resolución de distorsiones cognitivas (Meichenbaum y psicólogos cognitivos en general).”
Volviendo al estudio en cuestión, de  Back et al (2010),  pone a prueba ambas hipótesis, confirmando la de la extensión vital.  Los investigadores del estudio plantean que si esta es cierta, los contactos en redes sociales, observadores en el experimento, deberían ser capaces de inferir de forma precisa las características de las personalidades reales de los propietarios de perfiles en redes sociales.

transparencia

Y los resultados son claros:  se percibe la personalidad real e incluso cuando se introducen autovaloraciones de forma controlada, el efecto de la personalidad real es elevado.  No nos es fácil (ni nos gusta), ni en la vida offline ni en redes sociales virtuales, librarnos de nosotros mismos Sonrisa, sobre todo, como apuntan algunas peculiaridades del estudio, si somos extrovertidos (los resultados son similares para encuentros cara a cara) y abiertos (también con resultados similares en los entornos reales).
La precisión fue algo más baja en el caso de existir elementos de neuroticismo, lo cual es consistente con investigaciones previas, que muestran cómo el neuroticismo es difícil de detectar en todos los contextos (Funder, 1999; Kenny, 1994).

Quería dejar estos datos pero también recordar que tal vez lo que estemos observando sea efecto de la madurez, tanto de la web social, como de nuestra condición de internautas.  Ya sabéis que me siento y os siento más grandes gracias a la web social.

Del obscurantismo a una Identidad madura, transparente y aumentada
Cabe recuperar, en este sentido, la imagen que acompaña este post y que me sirve para explicar cómo vamos evolucionando hacia la sociedad de la transparencia:  la parte izquierda, cuando el perro le decía al otro perro que “nadie sabe que eres un perro en internet”, es propia de finales de los 90, de un primer momento de internet en el que percibíamos sus chats, sus mundos virtuales como juego, como mundo paralelo, como teatro (diría Goffman) y por tanto lugar seguro en el que podíamos experimentar roles o identidades ficticias.
Lo escribía en Cyborgs en las Ramblas (segunda parte del ebook que os enlazo):
Centrándonos ya en los IRC (similares a los chats) y similares, internet se convierte en un entorno de potencial liberación, en una plataforma, sociedad o escenario (Goffman) que contiene, dentro de su complejidad, tanto los deseos como las satisfacciones idóneas para tipos múltiples de individuos. Así, valiéndome de la metáfora psicoanalítica, la red resulta un lugar de ensueño, de alucinación colectiva y no consensual (STONE, 1992), donde el yo auténtico o esencial  tiene la ocasión de desarrollarse sin la amenaza de un superego que en la red es débil y difuso (el anonimato era, sin metáfora psicoanalítica, una forma de escapar al control social).
El ego, o aquella fracción inconsciente y vencida por la sociedad en la que todos nos hemos socializado, se despereza y desmarca ahora desde el espacio de los sueños al que venía estando relegado, al nuevo territorio que la tecnología le ofrece. Así, la interacción en red se relatará en muchas ocasiones como una experiencia de Flujo (en el sentido de CSIKSZENTMUHALY, M, 1996), de estado alterado de conciencia, de fase REM (SULER y cols. 1996), de espacio lúdico-terapéutico en el que expresar y satisfacer tanto las viejas necesidades creadas durante la socialización primaria como las nuevas (Teorías sobre economía del deseo, VAN DER LEUN, 1996), surgidas en ocasiones en la propia red.

Nos situamos hoy en la parte derecha de la imagen, en la que también podríamos dibujar al perro que encabeza el post, con ropajes humanos y que ha decidido ser persona, que se ha atrevido a ser quien quiere ser en el mundo “real”.
Y es que hay mucho de empoderamiento, de aprendizaje de la diversidad, de liberación favorable a la autoexpresión, de acercamiento entre lo que queremos ser y lo que somos en realidad en el viaje que hacemos a través de la red hacia nosotros mismos, en el proceso de madurez que intento describir.  Dicho en otras palabras, la identidad del individuo conectado es aumentada, mucho más potente, como decíamos al hablar del 15M, que antes del ejercicio de auto-conocimiento, auto-expresión y auto-realización que supone una interacción en redes sociales bien aprovechada.

Nunca me atrevo a decirlo, nunca lo tengo claro pero creo que sí, que las revoluciones sociales que vivimos eran previsibles, que sintiéndonos más grandes en la web teníamos que, necesariamente, terminar por reflejarlo en el exterior. Escribía en la prehistoria de 2003:
Cada cyborg será, una vez que se integre en la nueva sociedad, mejor. ¿Control Social? ¿Reproducción de jerarquías y normas? No niego sus manifestaciones, como reproducción de los que se producen en la sociedad real y con tendencia a aumentar, conforme a la propia madurez de la red, pero lo que no puede negarse es que para entonces habremos tenido ocasión, gracias a ella, de ampliar nuestro sentido democrático, nuestro ejercicio del derecho a la libertad de expresión, de una forma a la que será difícil que podamos renunciar.

ResearchBlogging.orgBack MD, Stopfer JM, Vazire S, Gaddis S, Schmukle SC, Egloff B, & Gosling SD (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological science, 21 (3), 372-4 PMID: 20424071


Posted: 22 Jul 2011 03:09 AM PDT
Os dejo la interesante entrevista que me havía ayer Blanca Salvatierra para Publico.es, con las correspondientes respuestas.
Las mias han salido hoy publicada junto a otras opiniones en un artículo llamado La maraña de las redes sociales que dejo enlazado aquí.
Con la aparición de Google+ y los rumores sobre que Microsoft está planificando su propia red social, la pregunta es ¿cuántas redes sociales puede manejar una persona sin volverse loco (Google+, Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin, etc)?
No sé si hay respuesta a cuántas redes sociales podemos manejar, más cuando evolucionarán las herramientas que unifiquen la experiencia de usuario, que permitan manejarlas todas a la vez. Lo que sí parece, según algunos estudios, es que existe un número, el denominado número de Dunbar en honor al antropólogo que lo formuló, máximo de contactos con los que podemos manejar, a nivel cognitivo, una relación significativa.
Quizás sea un número conservador y nuestros cerebros estén evolucionando con las posibilidades que van apareciendo, es pronto para medirlo, pero está claro que sí existe un límite para las relaciones más tradicionales. Otro tema es que estemos ampliando el tipo de relaciones que podemos establecer. No tiene porqué ser menos importante un contacto débil en red social virtual pero que me informa magníficamente que un vecino físico, por ejemplo.

¿Hay sitio para todas ellas o el lanzamiento de una nueva con éxito implica el comienzo del declive de otra (como en el caso de MySpace)?
Hemos pensado muchas veces que había límite pero nos han ido sorprendiendo. La sociabilidad del ser humano parece ilimitada, en número de redes y tipos de relaciones que somos capaces de establecer, inventar o reinventar.

¿Los 18 millones de usuarios que ha conseguido Google+ en tres semanas y las buenas críticas recibidas pueden hacer temblar los cimientos de la tan asentada Facebook?
Evidentemente le robarán cuota de mercado pero creo que iniciamos un largo periodo de convivencia, al estilo de lo que ocurre con los sistemas operativos (Microsoft, Apple, Linux, etc.) entre Facebook, Twitter y Plus como principales agentes mundiales.

¿Crees que es el lanzamiento definitivo para Google en cuanto a redes sociales tras el fiasco de Buzz?
Creo que es un intento fuerte, trabajado, con mayor inversión que los de Buzz o Wave pero internet es un buen lugar para el ensayo error y Google tiene muy clara la importancia del grafo social, no va a dejar de intentar conquistarlo porque sabe que es el el filtro natural de la información para el ser humano.
Otro de sus puntos fuertes de Plus que no quería dejar de observar es la polivalencia, la flexibilidad con que parece poder adaptarse a los muchos tipos de relación que podemos preferir. Pero una vez más, cada usuario decide, incluso si prefiere o se siente más seguro en redes sociales menos versátiles.

En fin… dejo contacto en Google Plus, por si os animáis.