viernes, 4 de julio de 2014

Fibromialgia/Fibromyalgia

Ultrasonido como guía para inyección de puntos gatillo miofascialesen los músculos subescapular y pectoral en pacientes postmastectomía. Estudio piloto


Application of ultrasound-guided trigger point injection for myofascial trigger points in the subscapularis and pectoralis muscles to post-mastectomy patients: a pilot study.
Shin HJ, Shin JC, Kim WS, Chang WH, Lee SC.
Yonsei Med J. 2014 May;55(3):792-9. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.3.792. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of ultrasound (US)-guided trigger point injection for myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the internal rotator muscles of the shoulder in post-mastectomy patients.MATERIALS AND METHODS:This pilot study was a non-controlled, prospective, clinical trial. Nineteen post-mastectomy patients with a diagnosis of at least one active MTrP in the subscapularis and/or pectoralis muscles were included. We performed trigger point injections into the subscapularis muscle deep behind the scapula as well as the pectoralis muscle for diagnostic and therapeutic purpose by the newly developed US-guided method. RESULTS: Visual analogue scale and range of motion of the shoulder for external rotation and of abduction showed significant improvement immediately after the first injection and 3 months after the last injection compared with baseline (p<0.05 for both). Duration from onset to surgery and duration of myofascial pain syndrome in the good responder group were significantly shorter than in the bad responder group (p<0.05). Patients did not report any complications related to the procedure or serious adverse events attributable to the treatment.CONCLUSION:In post-mastectomy patients with shoulder pain, US-guided trigger point injections of the subscapularis and/or pectoralis muscles are effective for both diagnosis and treatment when the cause of shoulder pain is suspected to originate from active MTrPs in these muscles, particularly, the subscapularis.
KEYWORDS:Myofascial pain syndrome; breast cancer; pain; trigger points; ultrasound
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3990076/pdf/ymj-55-792.pdf 



Suma temporal lenta del dolor para la evaluación de la sensibilidad al dolor central y dolor clínico de los pacientes con fibromialgia


Slow temporal summation of pain for assessment of central pain sensitivity and clinical pain of fibromyalgia patients.
Staud R, Weyl EE, Riley JL 3rd, Fillingim RB.

PLoS One. 2014 Feb 18;9(2):e89086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089086. eCollection 2014.

Abstract
BACKGROUND: In healthy individuals slow temporal summation of pain or wind-up (WU) can be evoked by repetitive heat-pulses at frequencies of ≥.33 Hz. Previous WU studies have used various stimulus frequencies and intensities to characterize central sensitization of human subjects including fibromyalgia (FM) patients. However, many trials demonstrated considerable WU-variability including zero WU or even wind-down (WD) at stimulus intensities sufficient for activating C-nociceptors. Additionally, few WU-protocols have controlled for contributions of individual pain sensitivity to WU-magnitude, which is critical for WU-comparisons. We hypothesized that integration of 3 different WU-trains into a single WU-response function (WU-RF) would not only control for individuals' pain sensitivity but also better characterize their central pain responding including WU and WD. METHODS:33 normal controls (NC) and 38 FM patients participated in a study of heat-WU. We systematically varied stimulus intensities of.4 Hz heat-pulse trains applied to the hands. Pain summation was calculated as difference scores of 1st and 5th heat-pulse ratings. WU-difference (WU-Δ) scores related to 3 heat-pulse trains (44°C, 46°C, 48°C) were integrated into WU-response functions whose slopes were used to assess group differences in central pain sensitivity. WU-aftersensations (WU-AS) at 15 s and 30 s were used to predict clinical FM pain intensity. RESULTS:WU-Δ scores linearly accelerated with increasing stimulus intensity (p<.001) in both groups of subjects (FM>NC) from WD to WU. Slope of WU-RF, which is representative of central pain sensitivity, was significantly steeper in FM patients than NC (p<.003). WU-AS predicted clinical FMpain intensity . CONCLUSIONS:Compared to single WU series, WU-RFs integrate individuals' pain sensitivity as well as WU and WD. Slope of WU-RFs was significantly different between FM patients and NC. Therefore WU-RF may be useful for assessing central sensitization of chronic pain patients in research and clinical practice.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3928405/pdf/pone.0089086.pdf


Atentamente
Anestesiología y Medicina del Dolor
www.anestesia-dolor.org
Publicar un comentario