Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta sedación paliativa. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta sedación paliativa. Mostrar todas las entradas

sábado, 14 de octubre de 2017

Guías para sedación paliativa / Guidelines for palliative sedation

Octubre 10, 2017. No. 2837



CTCT-20170914_102711 a.m.
Variaciones internacionales en las guías de práctica clínica para la sedación paliativa: una revisión sistemática.
International variations in clinical practice guidelines for palliative sedation: a systematic review.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Sep;7(3):223-229. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001159. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Palliative sedation is a highly debated medical practice, particularly regarding its proper use in end-of-life care. Worldwide, guidelines are used to standardise care and regulate this practice. In this review, we identify and compare  national/regional clinical practiceguidelines on palliative sedation against the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) palliative sedation Framework and assess the developmental quality of these guidelines using the Appraisal Guideline Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. METHODS: Using the PRISMA criteria, we searched multiple databases (PubMed, CancerLit, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, NHS Evidence and Google Scholar) for relevant guidelines, and selected those written in English, Dutch and Italian; published between January 2000 and March 2016. RESULTS: Of 264 hits, 13 guidelines-Belgium, Canada (3), Ireland, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Europe, and USA (2) were selected. 8 contained at least 9/10 recommendations published in the EAPC Framework; 9 recommended 'pre-emptive discussion of the potential role of sedation in end-of-life care'; 9 recommended 'nutrition/hydration while performing sedation' and 8 acknowledged the need to 'care for the medical team'. There were striking differences in terminologies used and in life expectancy preceding the practice. Selected guidelines were conceptually similar, comparing closely to the EAPC Framework recommendations, albeit with notable variations. CONCLUSIONS: Based on AGREE II, 3 guidelines achieved top scores and could therefore be recommended for use in this context. Also, domains 'scope and purpose' and 'editorial independence' ranked highest and lowest, respectively-underscoring the importance of good reportage at the developmental stage.
KEYWORDS: Clinical Practice Guideline; EAPC; Palliative Medicine; Sedation; Systematic Review; Terminal care
XXVII Congreso Peruano de Anestesiología
Lima, Noviembre 2-4, 2017
LI Congreso Mexicano de Anestesiología
Mérida Yucatán, Noviembre 21-25, 2017
Like us on Facebook   Follow us on Twitter   Find us on Google+   View our videos on YouTube 
Anestesiología y Medicina del Dolor

52 664 6848905