miércoles, 29 de diciembre de 2010

New York Struggles as Blizzard’s Impact Chastens Bloomberg

New York Struggles as Blizzard’s Impact Chastens Bloomberg

Todd Heisler/The New York Times
Cars stuck in the snow on Franklin Avenue in Brooklyn on Tuesday. More Photos »
As New York City struggled with huge snowdrifts left by a crippling blizzard the day before, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg acknowledged on Tuesday that the cleanup had been slower than expected and the impact worse than had been apparent when the snow stopped falling.
While major thoroughfares seemed at least passable, especially in Manhattan, streets across vast stretches of the city remained untouched, leaving tens of thousands of residents unable to get to jobs and many facing long waits for ambulances and other emergency services.
Plows were unable to clear scores of streets that remained blocked by stuck buses and cars.
City officials pressed resources from several agencies to work, as a chorus of complaints from residents and elected officials arose on blogs and call-in shows. Christine C. Quinn, the City Council speaker, who has often sided with the mayor, said the city’s response to the blizzard was the worst in memory.
“Clearly, the response was unacceptable,” said Ms. Quinn, who announced she would hold a hearing on the matter. “We’re hearing reports from all over of people not even having seen a plow by the afternoon of the day after. This is a level of lack of cleanup that I really can’t recall.”
At a midday news conference, Mr. Bloomberg set a more somber tone than he had a day earlier, when he assured New Yorkers that the cleanup was proceeding smoothly. On Tuesday, he said he had visited all five boroughs, and asked for patience as the city dealt with the sixth-biggest snowfall in its history.
“It is a bad situation,” he said, adding: “Nobody suggests that this is easy. Nobody suggests that this is pleasurable. But I can tell you this: We are doing everything that we can think of, working as hard as we can.”
His sanitation commissioner, John J. Doherty, said the department would not meet its usual goal of plowing all city streets within 36 hours after snow stops falling. Mr. Doherty said that he could not be certain when the work would be finished, and that some smaller streets might still remain impassable by Wednesday afternoon, more than 50 hours after the snow stopped.
Vito Turso, a department spokesman, said that as of 5 p.m. Tuesday, the agency had plowed 99 percent of the city’s primary thoroughfares, 76 percent of its secondary streets — those that feed into main arteries — and 52 percent of its tertiary roads since snow began. But many of those may need to be plowed again.
Mass transit limped back on Tuesday, as the area’s commuter railroads resumed limited service and airports began trying to move backlogs of stranded passengers. Two subway lines and dozens of bus routes remained out of commission. The city also grappled with many immobilized ambulances, fire trucks and tens of thousands of 911 calls since the storm began, many of them for minor troubles, city officials said.
As reasons for the snow-plowing delays, Mr. Bloomberg cited the storm’s fast-falling snow, and powerful winds that conspired to re-cover plowed streets. But he attributed much of the difficulty to drivers who tried to move their vehicles even as the snow fell hard on Sunday night and early Monday morning.
A shortage of tow trucks continued to hamper the effort, the mayor said. More than 1,000 private vehicles had been towed from just three main thoroughfares. More than 200 ambulances became stuck, some more than once, though all but 40 had been pulled out by Tuesday morning. Mr. Bloomberg said measures would be taken to prevent that from happening in the future.
“We’ve looked at some things that we probably could have done better,” the mayor said.
Some other officials were quick to criticize his decisions. Bill de Blasio, the city’s public advocate, said Mr. Bloomberg should have declared a snow emergency, requiring that parked vehicles be removed from major roadways, as the storm approached on Saturday evening. “I don’t think New Yorkers got a clear enough message,” Mr. de Blasio said.
Mr. Bloomberg told reporters that declaring a snow emergency would have led to more problems — though he spoke only of issuing an alert as snow fell, not before, when people would have time to respond.
“The snow emergency would require everybody on the main streets to move their car, and the question is, to where?” the mayor said. “All it would have done was put an awful lot more cars stuck in the middle of roads, which would have made plowing even more difficult.”
More questions are likely to be raised. The Council has scheduled a hearing on the response effort for Jan. 10. Some are already asking whether staffing reductions played a role in city plows’ inability to keep up with the snowfall on main streets during the storm — a problem that sanitation officials say kept them from starting on smaller roadways sooner.

The budget for the Sanitation Department, which runs snow removal efforts, has increased to $1.32 billion, from $1.09 billion in fiscal year 2006.
But the ranks of uniformed members have fallen to a planned 7,016 by next June from 7,733 in 2006, said Doug Turetsky, a spokesman for the city’s Independent Budget Office. That is the lowest staffing level since 1997, though the number has bounced up and down several times since. The Bloomberg administration shrank the department’s uniformed ranks by 400 through attrition but recently hired 100 new workers and ordered the demotion of 100 foremen back into the ranks of workers, said Harry Nespoli, president of the Uniformed Sanitationmen’s Association.
Mr. Nespoli said he believed that staffing should be increased, for just this sort of emergency. But he said the staff reductions and discord over the demotions had not slowed the city’s response to the storm. Rather, he said, the ferocity of the storm and stranded vehicles created special challenges.
“The day guys on Monday were having a hard time moving around because of stranded buses, cars and other vehicles,” Mr. Nespoli said. “That made for a slow start.”
In addition to the department’s 1,700 plows and the 2,000 workers it had on duty at any given time during the storm, Mr. Bloomberg listed numerous city agencies that were contributing personnel and equipment to the cleanup.
Another 70 private tow and 16 heavy-duty trucks were hired, as is common during large storms. But it was still not enough. The mayor said hiring private owners of heavy equipment had been difficult because so many companies were closed for the holidays.
As 911 calls poured in, Mr. Bloomberg said police officials had taken the unusual step of sending patrol cars to respond to calls for an ambulance, to provide coverage in case the ambulance does not arrive.
On Monday, there were 49,478 emergency calls, the sixth-highest total in the system’s history, said Paul J. Browne, the chief police spokesman. The most was during the 2003 blackout, with 96,660 calls; Sept. 11, 2001, brought the third-highest total, 55,574. Call volume was down on Tuesday, with 28,180.
Mr. Bloomberg said he shared the anger emanating from snowbound neighborhoods. But he also showed some irritation of his own, saying people’s perceptions were based largely on whether their own streets were clear.
“We cannot do everything all the time, and we are doing the best we can,” he said.
Street clearing remained uneven. Most streets in Upper Manhattan, from Harlem to Washington Heights, were cleared by noon Tuesday, though snow was still a problem on side streets where cars had blocked plows.
In Flatbush, Brooklyn, on Tuesday afternoon, a tractor-trailer blocked the intersection of Clarendon Road and Bedford Avenue, where it had been stuck since Monday. The driver, Alex Gonzalez, 30, said he was destined for a delivery in the neighborhood when the truck stopped.
“I knew it was going to be bad,” he said. “But when the company says you got to do a delivery, you’ve got to do a delivery.”
Around the corner, Wendell Thomas, 27, took the day off from work at Interfaith Hospital, where he is a janitor. “You can’t get a cab, you can’t get a bus,” Mr. Thomas said. “It’s like we’re held hostage. But we still got rent to pay. We still got bills to pay.

Wi-Fi Overload at High-Tech Meetings

Wi-Fi Overload at High-Tech Meetings

Robert Galbraith/Reuters
Last June, Steven Jobs of Apple asked people to turn off laptops and phones because a strained network was interfering with his presentation.
SAN FRANCISCO — Internet entrepreneurs climb on stage at technology conferences and praise a world in which everyone is perpetually connected to the Web.
But down in the audience, where people are busy typing and transmitting this wisdom, getting a Wi-Fi connection is often downright impossible.
“I’ve been to 50 events where the organizer gets on stage and says, ‘It will work,’ ” said Jason Calacanis, chief executive of Mahalo, a Web search company. “It never does.”
Last month in San Francisco at the Web 2.0 Summit, where about 1,000 people heard such luminaries as Mark Zuckerberg of FacebookJulius Genachowski, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, and Eric E. Schmidt of Google talk about the digital future, the Wi-Fi slowed or stalled at times.
Earlier this year, Steven P. JobsApple’s chief executive, had to ask the audience at his company’s developer conference to turn off their laptops and phones after his introduction of the iPhone 4 was derailed because of an overloaded Wi-Fi network.
And few of Silicon Valley’s technorati seem willing to forget one of the biggest Wi-Fi breakdowns, on the opening day of a conference in 2008 co-hosted by the technology blog TechCrunch. It left much of the audience steaming over the lack of Internet access. The next morning, the organizers — who included Mr. Calacanis — clambered onto the stage to apologize and announce that they had fired the company that installed the Wi-Fi.
Technology conferences are like revival meetings for entrepreneurs, deal makers and the digitally obsessed. Attendees compulsively blog, e-mail, text and send photos and video from their seats.
Some go so far as to watch a webcast of the event on their laptops rather than look up at the real thing right in front of them. Nearly all conferences make free Wi-Fi available to keep the crowd feeling connected and productive.
The problem is that Wi-Fi was never intended for large halls and thousands of people, many of them bristling with an arsenal of laptops, iPhones and iPads. Mr. Calacanis went to the extreme at the Web 2.0 Summit by bringing six devices to get online — a laptop, two smartphones and three wireless routers.
He explained — while writing e-mails on his laptop — that as a chief executive and investor, he needed dependable Internet access at all times. “You’ve still got to work,” Mr. Calacanis said.
Wi-Fi is meant for homes and other small spaces with more modest Internet demands, says Ernie Mariette, founder of Mariette Systems, which installs conference Wi-Fi. “You’re asking a technology to operate beyond its capability.”
Conference organizers and the Wi-Fi specialists they hire often fail to provide enough bandwidth. Many depend on the infrastructure that the hotels or convention centers hosting their events already have in place.
Companies that install Wi-Fi networks sometimes have only a day to set up their equipment in a hall and then test it. They must plan not only for the number of attendees, but also the size and shape of the room, along with how Wi-Fi signals reflect from walls and are absorbed by the audience.
“Every space is different and every crowd is different,” Mr. Mariette said.
What is good enough for a convention of podiatrists is woefully inadequate for Silicon Valley’s connected set.
“I’ve been to health care conferences where no one brings a laptop,” said Ross Mayfield, president of the business software company Socialtext and a technology conference regular.
Technology conferences are an anomaly. Some regulars joke, perhaps accurately, that the events are host to more Internet devices per square foot than anywhere in the world. All too often, the network freezes after becoming overwhelmed with all the nonstop streaming, downloading and social networking.
That was what happened this year at the RailsConf, a software conference in Baltimore, when attendees caused Wi-Fi gridlock by tuning in to a webcast of an unrelated event across the country. Nearly everyone, it turned out, wanted to watch Apple’s live unveiling of the iPhone 4, the very one that fell victim to a Wi-Fi crash.
Adding more Wi-Fi access points does not necessarily fix the problem, Mr. Mariette said. In fact, doing so may make the situation worse by creating more interference.
To avoid Wi-Fi gridlock, conference organizers sometimes ask attendees to turn off electronics they are not using and to refrain from downloading big files. Cooperation is generally mixed, however.
Last year, an attendee at Web 2.0 Expo in New York was so desperate to get online that he offered to pay Oren Michels, chief executive of Mashery, a Web services company, to share his mobile Internet connection. MiFi, as the device is called, enables users to create mini-Internet hot spots using a mobile carrier’s network, not conference Wi-Fi.
“He said, ‘Can I give you 20 bucks for access?’ ” Mr. Michels recalled. “It was just some random person sitting next to me.”
Even if Wi-Fi devices are not connected to the network, they constantly emit signals that create background noise, sometimes until it becomes impossible to get online. IPhones and most BlackBerrys, along with certain laptops, are more susceptible than other devices because they operate on 2.4 GHz, a part of the spectrum that offers only three channels.
The Wi-Fi curse also extends to tech industry press conferences. Google, for instance, once held a press day at its headquarters in Mountain View, Calif., during which the Wi-Fi failed for several hours, although it was restored during the event’s final minutes. The flub did not exactly build confidence that Google and its partner, EarthLink, could deliver on their plans — since abandoned — to blanket San Francisco with free Wi-Fi.

In the Rearview, a Year That Fizzled

ECONOMIC SCENE

In the Rearview, a Year That Fizzled

Washington

Readers' Comments

It was the year that the economy started to recover and then slid back into a slump — only to offer reason for renewed hope in the final weeks.
When 2010 began, hiring and consumer spending were finally picking up. But then something changed in the spring — a combination of the debt troubles in Europe, the fading of stimulus spending and the usual caution by businesses and consumers after a financial crisis. By the summer, the unemployment rate was rising again, and Americans’ attitudes about the future were again souring.
Making matters worse, many of the economy’s long-term problems also became more severe this year. Health care costs continued to rise faster than inflation, and the number of uninsured continued to grow. The most recent climate data suggested 2010 would be the hottest or second-hottest year ever recorded; the 10 hottest have all occurred in the last 13 years, creating serious risks for the planet and its economy. The federal budget deficit ballooned further (though it should grow during an economic slump).
The reasons for optimism about 2011 come from both Washington and the private sector. The Federal Reserve and Congress have finally taken more action to lift economic growth, and the latest data — on consumer spending and jobless claims, among other things — has been good. The housing market remains weak, but sales and prices are no longer plunging.
On the longer-term issues, the recent work by President Obama’s bipartisan deficit commission suggested that Democrats and Republicans might eventually find some common ground on the issue. And the health care overhaul passed in March — assuming it survives legal challenges — is likely to cut the number of uninsured sharply and to reduce cost growth modestly. The one issue that offers little reason for optimism is climate change.
Among the big questions for 2011 are: How severe will state and local budget crises turn out to be? Will Europe’s debt troubles spread to Spain, Portugal or elsewhere? Will Congress and the White House manage to focus on the long-run causes of the deficit — or instead cut federal spending immediately and jeopardize the recovery? Will consumers continue to increase their spending and give businesses the confidence to hire?
To look back at 2010 and to look ahead, we have put together a series of charts. If there is an overall message, it’s that the economy still needs a whole lot of work.
E-mail: leonhardt@nytimes.com

Injustice, British and Otherwise

MOVIE REVIEW

Another Year

Simon Mein/Sony Pictures Classics
“Another Year”: Jim Broadbent and Ruth Sheen play a happy couple surrounded by less fulfilled souls in this film, which opens on Wednesday in Manhattan.

Injustice, British and Otherwise

Class consciousness has frequently played a role in Mike Leigh’s films, and not only because, as a storyteller whose native terrain is modern Britain, he can hardly hope to avoid it. And sure enough, the observant viewer of his splendidly rich and wise new feature, “Another Year,” will notice the shadows that an always-evolving system of social hierarchy casts over the passage of the seasons. (“We’re all graduates,” one character reminds another, with the prickly pride of belonging to the first generation to receive a university education in an era of expanded opportunity.)

More About This Movie

Related

Simon Mein/Sony Pictures Classics
Lesley Manville, above, plays a character who is needy, insecure and prone to drink too much.
But in this movie, as in its immediate precursor, “Happy-Go-Lucky,” Mr. Leigh is also after a more elusive and troubling form of injustice, one that is almost cosmically mysterious even as it penetrates, and sometimes threatens to poison, the relationships that make up everyday life.
Like “Happy-Go-Lucky,” though on a somewhat larger scale, “Another Year” is about the unequal distribution of happiness. Why do some people — like Tom and Gerri, the post-’60s 60-something couple at the center of this episodic story — seem to have an inexhaustible, even superabundant supply, while others seem unable to acquire even the smallest portion? Can happiness be borrowed, stolen or inherited? Is it earned by meritorious works or granted by the obscure operations of grace?
These may sound like silly, abstract questions, but they could hardly be more serious or more relevant. Here in America, after all, the pursuit of happiness has the status of a foundational right, coincident, but not quite identical, with material prosperity. In Britain, where dourness can seem to be as much a part of the stereotypical national character as bad food, foul weather and precise distinctions of status, the assertion of a right to be happy can seem almost revolutionary.
Certainly Poppy, the antically joyful heroine of “Happy-Go-Lucky,” was a radically free spirit, almost violent in her expressions of good feeling. Tom and Gerri, played with uncanny subtlety and tremendous soul by Jim Broadbentand Ruth Sheen, are much more subdued but no less radiant, and just as extreme in their delight. Their long, comfortable marriage seems to have unfolded without serious friction or disappointment.
Tom is a geologist who lends his expertise to public works projects in London and abroad, and whose professional enthusiasm combines a craftsman’s pride in handiwork with a nerd’s glee at knowing stuff. Gerri is a therapist who counsels patients at a clinic, one of them a lower-middle-class housewife (played by Imelda Staunton, the star of Mr. Leigh’s“Vera Drake”), whose bottomless despair is the complete reverse of Gerri’s fulfillment.
The film’s more complicated and sustained contrast is between Gerri and Mary, her co-worker and longtime friend, played by Lesley Manville with the kind of wrenching, borderline-unbearable lack of self-protective actorly vanity that reminds you that, however gentle it may seem, this is still a Mike Leigh film. In other words, the spectacle of humiliation that takes place when uncomfortable self-consciousness turns into its opposite is never far away. Such mortal embarrassment stalks Mary, who is needy, insecure and prone to drink too much, and also Ken (Peter Wight), an old chum of Tom’s who packs the same traits into a large, shambling masculine frame.
In their company, Tom and Gerri are patient, kind and nonjudgmental, offering advice and encouragement and overlooking behavior that might make less generous spirits cringe. But their goodness is so thorough that it may inspire some unkind thoughts. Do they associate with Mary and Ken out of genuine affection, or because spending time with such miserable types makes them feel (and look) better? Is their tolerant solicitude a form of complacency? And is “Another Year” therefore not a loving portrait of the modern liberal temperament but rather a quietly seething indictment of its nose-in-the-air narcissism?