miércoles, 12 de enero de 2011

A Cult Winemaker Tinkers With Success

THE POUR

A Cult Winemaker Tinkers With Success


Craig Lee for The New York Times
Kistler’s Sonoma vineyards now produce wines of finesse rather than power.



SEBASTOPOL, Calif.
Craig Lee for The New York Times
OUT here in Sonoma County south of the Russian River, where a rolling ocean of vineyards surrounds a few surviving Gravenstein apple orchards, the growing season is typically long and warm. Grapes customarily bask in the ripening sun until they practically burst with sweetness. The challenge is to prevent the grapes from ripening too much.
Last year was different. Until the heat spiked at the last minute, 2010 had been one of the coolest seasons on record. Nobody knew if the grapes would mature enough. That meant trouble. Or maybe a lucky break.
“Everybody was worried about getting things ripe,” said Jason Kesner, the assistant winemaker at Kistler Vineyards. “We had the acid, we had the color, we had the flavor, but we didn’t have the typical California sugar to match up with it. We had the tremendous opportunity to make wines at lower alcohol levels. It was the holy grail we’d all been asking for.”
Really? For more than 30 years, restraint was not a quality remotely associated with Kistler. In the 1980s and ’90s, as Americans developed a ravenous thirst for chardonnay, Kistler set a standard of quality with its powerful, oaky, voluptuous wines. Using grapes from small lots in prime vineyards in Sonoma and the Carneros, it was among a handful of California wineries that pioneered the use of Burgundian techniques, like fermenting in small oak barrels.
American critics raved about the wines, placing them at the pinnacle of California chardonnay. More quietly, Kistler was also lauded for its pinot noirs.
As Kistler’s lush, exuberant style was widely emulated, it became one of the first modern California cult wineries, its wines available only in restaurants or to long-term customers. It was a model for today’s mailing-list avatars of the full-blown California chardonnay style, like Aubert and Peter Michael. Indeed, some producers began making even more powerful wines so overflowing with flavor they made Kistler’s look almost sedate.
But with little fanfare, the Kistler style has changed in the last few years. Following the evolving tastes of Steve Kistler, one of its proprietors, rather than the pressure of economic necessity, Kistler has stepped back, striving for finesse and energy rather than power.
Kistler’s departure from its extraordinarily successful style is a shock, and perhaps even risky business. And yet the California wine industry has seen a stylistic evolution in the last decade, especially with chardonnays. More and more wines seek elegance and vivacity rather than sumptuous force.
Partly, this is a retreat from the overuse of oak, with many more producers marketing their wines as “unoaked” or “steel fermented.” Similarly, more producers now tout their chardonnays as “Chablis-like,” evoking the leaner, more minerally style of that region rather than the richer, more opulent chardonnays of the Côte de Beaune, the home of Meursault and Montrachet.
Even many chardonnay producers who continue to pursue the Côte de Beaune ideal, like Littorai, Peay, Rivers-Marie and Failla, are aiming more for grace than for power. As a result, the spectrum of California styles seems wider and less monochromatic today, with room for chardonnays in the leanest to the most luxuriant styles. Kistler’s wines are still ample — certainly not on the Chablis end of the spectrum — but they now seem fresher, more focused and finely etched.
“Was there a time when we erred on the side of uniformity, of over-fine tuning, of picking later, only when every last cluster was ripe?” asked Mr. Kistler, who owns the company with his business partner, Mark Bixler. “Maybe so, but we’ve evolved, as I think others have, too.”
While some customers say they miss the wines that made Kistler famous, he says the evolution has mostly been well received.
“We don’t worry if the pinot noir isn’t dark enough,” he said. “Some people do ask us to return to the overblown, blowzy style of chardonnay, but no.”

Indeed, the Kistler business has been affected more by the economy than by the stylistic change, but even the economy hasn’t put a serious crimp into sales. The entire production, about 20,000 cases of chardonnay and 5,000 cases of pinot noir, used to be available only in restaurants or by the mailing list, where the single-vineyard chardonnays sell for around $75 and the pinot noirs range from $75 to $90. But now you can find the Kistler Noisetiers chardonnay, the lowest echelon, a blend of several vineyards but representative of the style, for around $60 in retail shops.
Craig Lee for The New York Times
Steve Kistler (left) and his assistant, Jason Kesner, at Kistler Vineyards in Sebastopol, Calif.
Mr. Kistler, 62, attributes the change inside the bottle to his own developing preferences. “My tastes now run toward more structured, lively wines that go with food, that have power and finesse at the same time,” he said as we spoke outside his winery, looking out over the adjacent Vine Hill Vineyard, the source of some of his best chardonnays. Even there, change is visible. He and Mr. Kesner are replanting part of the vineyard, reorienting and tweaking the vines so the grapes can be picked earlier, when, as Mr. Kesner puts it, “the fruit is at a peak level of energy.”
Even before the changes, Kistler chardonnays were pure and deep. Yet I’d had mixed experiences with them. Some I had found to be wonderfully ripe and laden with mineral flavors, rich yet tense. Others seemed flaccid, hot and oaky, without much staying power. The pinot noirs were commanding expressions of fruit, but somewhat chunky rather than elegant.
The move to harvest earlier began, almost serendipitously, with the 2006 vintage, when Mr. Kistler had to pick certain lots of chardonnay grapes earlier than usual to beat bad weather. In the resulting wines, which were not released until 2008, he found wonderful and surprising characteristics.
“That was a definite eye-opener,” Mr. Kesner said.
It was a decisive element in a continuing effort, particularly with the pinot noirs, to make wines that were intense but not heavy, fresh rather than brawny. In their quest, they’ve committed themselves to indigenous rather than cultured yeasts, to using fewer new barrels and, over all, to letting go of overt control in the vineyard and cellar. Describing their approach, Mr. Kesner quoted the jazz great Charlie Parker:
“Don’t play the saxophone, let the saxophone play you,” he said.
Mr. Kistler said, simply, “We’ve really worked hard on them the last 10 years, and we’re making much better wines.”
Tasting the wines, I can’t help but agree with Mr. Kistler. The 2008 McCrea Vineyard chardonnay from Sonoma Mountain is lovely, light-bodied and energetic, with creamy mineral flavors. The ’08 Vine Hill is more austere and tightly coiled than the McCrea, while the ’08 Hudson is richer in texture, with an almost briny flavor, and the ’08 Stone Flat is tangy, with a waxy, lanolin texture and beautiful mineral flavors.
What has not changed at Kistler is an underlying philosophy of meticulous attention to detail with an aim to express subtle differences in terroir. As it always has, Kistler tries to reduce variables so that vineyard characteristics will stand out. It uses only one clone of chardonnay, for example, a California heritage selection rather than something developed in France to meet Burgundian needs. That clone, in turn, mutates over time within each vineyard, becoming part of the terroir.
“We were unusual 30 years ago in that we planted vineyards and chose techniques to make wines of a certain style,” Mr. Kistler said. “We never were interested in fruit-driven chardonnays. Our goal was wonderful mineral wines with a soil-driven character.”
For the pinot noirs, Kistler has narrowed its focus to western Sonoma County and coastal sites east of Bodega Bay. The ’08 Kistler Vineyard pinot noir, from a few miles south of the Vine Hill Vineyard, is surprisingly delicate and harmonious, with lingering floral, fruit and mineral flavors. The ’08 Cuvée Natalie from the nearby Silver Belt Vineyard is more intense, not quite as well-knit, perhaps still a work in progress. By contrast, a barrel sample of a 2009 pinot noir from one of the coastal vineyards stands out for its freshness and energy.
“That’s what makes us as excited as we were 30 years ago,” Mr. Kistler said.

Changes have come not only to the wines, but also to the business. Since its founding in 1978, Kistler has largely been a two-man operation. Mr. Kistler oversaw vineyard and winemaking operations, while Mr. Bixler took charge of laboratory work and the business. In an era of uninhibited marketing in which winemakers have been propelled to superstar status, Mr. Kistler has shunned publicity and overt salesmanship.
“We’ve always been more comfortable letting the wines speak for themselves,” said Mr. Kistler, a lean, private man with a quiet, almost hesitant manner.
In 2008, though, he expanded the roster, adding Mr. Kesner, who, as manager of Hudson Vineyards in Carneros, a prime source for Kistler chardonnays, had established a comfortable working relationship with Mr. Kistler.
“For all those years we got by without assistance,” Mr. Kistler said. “But in order to take everything to the next level, there was only so much I could do.”
The next level meant more than refining the vineyard and cellar work. It also meant thinking of the future. As with many family-run operations, generational succession is an issue. Just a few years ago, Warren Winiarski sold Stag’s Leap Wine Cellars, the historic Napa estate, after it became clear that his daughter was not committed to carrying it on. Mr. Kistler has two daughters, but neither so far has become involved in the wine business. Instead of selling, Mr. Kistler hired Mr. Kesner, 42, who says he views his job as an Old World apprenticeship.
Mr. Kesner says he shares Mr. Kistler’s inclination for privacy. But he also said he believes Mr. Kistler deserves more recognition, both for his wines and his dedicated approach, and prodded him to speak publicly.
“I feel very much like Charlie Bucket, and I’ve found the golden ticket,” Mr. Kesner said. “I want everyone to know how wondrous it is inside the chocolate factory.”

Songs Say One Thing, Actions Another

MUSIC REVIEW

Songs Say One Thing, Actions Another

You can absolutely judge a band by its covers, a cursory examination of the classics played on Monday night by the young country duo Steel Magnolia showed. There was “After the Fire Is Gone,” the Loretta Lynn-Conway Twitty lament; the feisty Stevie Nicks scold “Stop Draggin’ My Heart Around”; and “Jackson,” popularized by Johnny and June Carter Cash, which masks deep resentment beneath pep and winks.
Chad Batka for The New York Times
Steel Magnolia The country duo, made up of Meghan Linsey and Joshua Scott Jones, performed at the Bowery Ballroom on Monday night. They won the second season of the CMT reality show “Can You Duet.”

Blog

ArtsBeat
The latest on the arts, coverage of live events, critical reviews, multimedia extravaganzas and much more.Join the discussion.
Chad Batka for The New York Times
Ms. Linsey and Mr. Jones. Their debut album, “Steel Magnolia,” was released this week.
So this is love, then, or at least its underbelly. Steel Magnolia is made up of Meghan Linsey and Joshua Scott Jones, a couple both musical and romantic. And during this Bowery Ballroom concert in celebration of their self-titled debut album (on Big Machine), which was released this week, they made clear how tough it is to maintain a well-oiled duo.
Not professionally — the singing was mostly fine, sometimes more than that. But this show, which had maybe half the energy of the duo’s charming album, was more a referendum on whether love can survive fame and its mandates.
Steel Magnolia was the winner of the second season of the CMT reality show “Can You Duet.” Ms. Linsey and Mr. Jones were a couple, both kinds, before trying out for the show. But their heat is drawn less from their time as reality-TV victors than from their combustibility as young lovers.
The range of emotion was on display during this sparsely attended show (not a good relationship portent, as these things go). During “Ooh La La,” the first song, Mr. Jones scooted over to Ms. Linsey’s microphone to coo a bit, while she looked sullen, a pose she maintained for much of the night. During “Eggs Over Easy,” he appeared desperate to cuddle her, to cheer her up. Finally, on the smoky single“Just by Being You (Halo and Wings),” she began to edge her way toward him, but maybe she just wanted to make sure he heard her belting.
Ms. Linsey has a firm, brassy voice, with shades of Southern soul and gospel. Mr. Jones’s is crisper, at times with the linear thrust of Daryl Hall. For most of the night, the volume on her microphone appeared to be lower than his, or maybe she was restraining her ample voice so as not to maul his, or both. Match that with a display that included what appeared to be genuine lack of interest and, sometimes, ire, and the couple’s more tender songs, like “Last Night Again,” could feel hollow.
“Do you get along when you’re working on the music thing?” Mr. Jones had asked the veteran mother-daughter duo the Judds during a mentoring session on “Can You Duet.” “Because we don’t at all.” (While we’re on the subject, pour a little liquor for the more gifted but less charismatic first-season winners, Caitlin & Will, paired as part of the TV show’s cruel conceit of sometimes splitting established duos to form new ones, who disbanded after releasing only a tepid EP.)
But there’s hope. Mr. Jones said he wrote “Without You” while Ms. Linsey was mad at him, and they finished it together. On it they traded lines, picking up the melody easily from each other, and at the end, sang into one microphone, eyes fixed on each other, a blatant gimmick that transcended itself. Better were the many moments in which one hoped to catch the other’s eye, but didn’t — still looking for affirmation through it all.
To close out the encore, they performed the bruised Hank Williams number “I’m So Lonesome I Could Cry,” a song they sang on “Can You Duet.” Finally, Ms. Linsey was unleashed, her voice roaring, while Mr. Jones got impressionistic with his electric guitar, playing scraped-up, wobbly chords that poked and prodded at the edges of Ms. Linsey’s lines. It sounded formidable, these two voices not speaking the same language.

Legal Strategy Could Hinge on Mental Assessment

Legal Strategy Could Hinge on Mental Assessment

The disturbing photograph of Jared L. Loughner that was released after his arrest, as well as the writings and statements attributed to him, seemed to point to a man with a mental disorder.
Pima County Sheriff's Office
A photograph of Jared L. Loughner released by the Pima County Sheriff’s Office.
Even if that is found to be true, the lawyers for Mr. Loughner, the 22-year-old college dropout who has been charged in the Tucson shootings, may find it difficult to mount a successful insanity defense.
The rules regarding such a legal strategy were tightened over the years in the wake of the verdict for John W. Hinckley Jr., who was found not guilty by reason of insanity in the 1981 assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan. The insanity argument is now seldom successful, legal experts said.
What is more likely, they say, is that Mr. Loughner’s lawyers will use any mental health problems they find to stave off the death penalty, if he should go to trial and be convicted.
His lawyer, Judy Clarke, is likely to begin a far-ranging investigation of his life and family history, going back several generations to learn as much as possible about his origins, the environment in which he grew up and how he has functioned in society, said David I. Bruck, who worked with Ms. Clarke in the defense of Susan Smith, the South Carolina woman who drowned her two young sons in 1994 and who received a life sentence.
Ms. Clarke “will present a case which is focused, grounded in the facts, thorough and heartfelt,” said Mr. Bruck, a veteran death-penalty lawyer and a professor at Washington and Lee University in Lexington, Va. “She won’t try to sell what she wouldn’t buy. She’s going to find this man’s story, and once she’s found it, she’s going to be confident about telling it to a jury.”
But just where Ms. Clarke will tell that story — and before how many juries — is unclear.
The defense could ask that Mr. Loughner’s case be moved from Arizona out of concern that potential jurors might be influenced by news accounts.
Mr. Loughner (pronounced LOF-ner) may also have to be defended in separate trials brought by federal and state prosecutors, who are both likely to seek the death penalty.
The federal government has charged Mr. Loughner in the killings of two federal employees — Judge John M. Roll, the chief federal judge for Arizona, and Gabriel Zimmerman, an aide to Representative Gabrielle Giffords — and the Pima County attorney, Barbara LaWall, has said she will “pursue charges on behalf of the nonfederal victims.”
Her office has been researching the issue of whether it can proceed at the same time as the federal prosecutors, or whether the state’s case will have to wait until the United States attorney’s office has finished its work.
“I think initially there’ll be some confusion as to who’s going to go first, and how fast they are going to go,” said Rory Little, a former Justice Department official in the Clinton administration who teaches at the Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco.
“I would guess that you’re having some pretty intense discussions now between the federal government and the state side, and it wouldn’t surprise me to see the case divided up,” he said.
Either way, federal and state prosecutors would have two opportunities to seek the death penalty against Mr. Loughner if they chose to do so. That occurred in the case stemming from the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City, which killed 168 people, including infants and children in a day care center. One defendant,Timothy J. McVeigh, received the death penalty at his federal trial, but a second, Terry L. Nichols, did not.
Mr. Nichols was tried again, on state charges, in McAlester, Okla. He was again spared execution.
Beth A. Wilkinson, a member of the federal prosecution team in the Oklahoma City case, said of the Tucson shootings: “In a crime like this, it’s also very important to recognize the state’s interest in prosecuting murder and attempted murder of their citizens. The vast majority of murder cases are prosecuted by state authorities.”
Neither the Justice Department nor the Pima County attorney’s office have said if it would pursue the death penalty against Mr. Loughner.
One of Ms. Clarke’s critical early steps will be to argue against any federal death-penalty case through a written submission and in meetings with federal prosecutors in Arizona and with the Justice Department’s Capital Case Committee in Washington. Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. will have the final say.
Aitan D. Goelman, who also was involved in the federal prosecution of the Oklahoma City case, said he doubted that an effort to block a death-penalty prosecution would prevail. “These kinds of cases are essentially the reason we have the federal death penalty,” he said.
The federal complaint against Mr. Loughner charges him with the murders of Judge Roll and Mr. Zimmerman, along with the attempted murders of Ms. Giffords, who was struck in the head but survived, and of two of her staff members, Pamela Simon and Ronald Barber, who were both wounded and were expected to recover.
One complication is that Mr. Loughner’s lawyers can only pursue the insanity defense if the defendant approves, said Stephen J. Morse, a professor of law and psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania.
“It cannot be imposed on a defendant over his objection,” Professor Morse said.
He said that lawyers in federal court tend to regard the insanity plea as “a defense of last resort, because juries are skeptical of claims that a defendant was not responsible for his actions.”
Still, he said, given early accounts of the evidence that has surfaced in the Tucson case — that Mr. Loughner appears to have carefully planned his attack on Ms. Giffords — his only chance might be to invoke such a defense.
“Based on the early information,” Professor Morse said, “I would be surprised if he didn’t, because he seems to have no other defense as far as I can tell.”
Marc Lacey contributed reporting from Tucson.

En este día....

On This Day in HistoryWednesday, January 12th
The 012th day of 2011.
There are 353 days left in the year.
Go to a previous date.
Go to lesson


Today's Highlights in History
Buy a Reproduction
NYT Front PageSee a larger version of this front page.
On Jan. 12, 1915, the United States House of Representatives rejected a proposal to give women the right to vote. (Go to article.)On Jan. 12 , 1876Jack London , the American author best known for his novel "The Call of the Wild" , was born. Following his death on Nov. 221916, his obituary appeared in The Times. (Go to obit. | Other Birthdays)
Editorial Cartoon of the Day

On January 12, 1861Harper's Weekly featured a cartoon about secession. (See the cartoon and read an explanation.)

On this date in:
1519Holy Roman Emperor Maximilian I died.
1773The first public museum in America was established, in Charleston, S.C.
1932Hattie W. Caraway, a Democrat from Arkansas, became the first woman elected to the U.S. Senate.
1945Soviet forces began a huge offensive against the Germans in Eastern Europe during World War II.
1948The Supreme Court ruled that states could not discriminate against law-school applicants because of race.
1959Berry Gordy Jr. founded Motown Records (originally Tamla Records) in Detroit.
1969Led Zeppelin's self-titled first album was released.
1969The New York Jets defeated the Baltimore Colts 16-7 in Super Bowl III at the Orange Bowl in Miami.
1971The sitcom "All in the Family" premiered on CBS.
1991A deeply divided Congress gave President George H.W. Bush the authority to use force to expel Iraq from Kuwait. (The Senate vote was 52-47; the House followed suit 250-183.)
1998Linda Tripp provided Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr's office with taped conversations between herself and former White House intern Monica Lewinsky.
2000The Supreme Court gave police broad authority to stop and question people who run at the sight of an officer.
2005Britain's Prince Harry apologized after a newspaper published a photograph of the young royal wearing a Nazi uniform to a costume party.
2006Mehmet Ali Agca, the Turkish gunman who'd shot Pope John Paul II in 1981, was released from an Istanbul prison.
2006A stampede broke out during the Islamic hajj pilgrimage in Saudi Arabia, killing 363 people.
2010Haiti was struck by a magnitude-7 earthquake, killing as many as 300,000 residents and leaving over 1.5 million people homeless.

Current Birthdays
Howard Stern turns 57 years old today.

AP Photo/Evan Agostini Radio talk show host Howard Stern turns 57 years old today.

85Ray Price
Country singer
81Glenn Yarborough
Singer
76The Amazing Kreskin
Magician
72William Lee Golden
Country singer (The Oak Ridge Boys)
67Joe Frazier
Boxing Hall of Famer
67Cynthia Robinson
Rock musician (Sly and the Family Stone)
60Kirstie Alley
Actress ("Cheers")
60Rush Limbaugh
Radio talk show host
59Ricky Van Shelton
Country singer
53Christiane Amanpour
Broadcast journalist
51Oliver Platt
Actor
51Dominique Wilkins
Basketball Hall of Famer
47Jeff Bezos
Amazon.com founder and CEO
45Rob Zombie
Rock singer
44Vendela
Model
43Rachael Harris
Actress
37Melanie Chisholm
Singer (Spice Girls)
24Naya Rivera
Actress ("Glee")
Historic Birthdays
Jack London
 
1/12/1876 - 11/22/1916
American novelist 

(Go to obit.)

61John Winthrop
1/12/1588 (O.S.) - 3/26/1649 (O.S.)
Massachusetts Bay Colony founder

75Charles Perrault
1/12/1628 - 5/16/1703
French poet

56John Hancock
1/12/1737(O.S.)- 10/8/1793 (O.S.)
American revolutionary leader

41Jakob Michael Lenz
1/12/1751 - 5/24/1792
Russian-born German poet

69Francis Henry Underwood
1/12/1825 - 8/7/1894
American lawyer/author

69John Singer Sargent
1/12/1856 - 4/15/1925
Italian-born American artist

86Max Eastman
1/12/1883 - 3/25/1969
American poet/editor

80Louis Horst
1/12/1884 - 1/23/1964
American pianist/composer

53Hermann Goering
1/12/1893 - 10/15/1946
German Nazi commander


Go to a previous date.

SOURCE: The Associated Press
Front Page Image Provided by UMI