sábado, 19 de marzo de 2011

Se reduce la capa de ozono debido a temperaturas inusualmente bajas en el Ártico


Se reduce la capa de ozono debido a temperaturas inusualmente bajas en el Ártico
Investigadores financiados con fondos comunitarios han descubierto que la temperatura inusualmente baja de la capa de ozono del Ártico ha generado una reducción a gran escala de la misma. Los descubrimientos muestran que, si se confirma este deterioro sin precedentes, el Ártico podría contar en breve con mucha menos protección contra los rayos ultravioletas del sol.
FUENTE | CORDIS: Servicio de Información en I+D Comunitario18/03/2011
El estudio recibió fondos del proyecto RECONCILE («Reconciliación de parámetros de procesamiento esenciales para una mayor capacidad de predicción de la pérdida de ozono estratosférico ártico y sus interacciones con el clima»), financiado con 3,5 millones de euros mediante el área temática «Medio ambiente» del Séptimo Programa Marco (7PM) de la Unión Europea. 

Coordinado por la Unidad de Investigación de Potsdam del Instituto Alfred Wegener de Investigación Polar y Marina de la Asociación Helmholtz (AWI, Alemania), el proyecto contó con la participación de dieciséis instituciones de investigación de ocho Estados miembros y más de treinta estaciones de sondeo de ozono situadas en toda la zona ártica y subártica. El objetivo general es el de comprender los detalles que aún no han quedado claros en torno a la compleja relación que existe entre la capa de ozono y el cambio climático. Aún son muchos los aspectos relacionados con la reducción de la capa de ozono que precisan aclaración, como por ejemplo cómo se mezcla y transporta a altitudes elevadas el aire procesado. 

El Dr. Markus Rex, investigador del AWI, comentó: «Nuestras mediciones muestran que durante las últimas semanas y en las altitudes que nos interesan se ha destruido cerca de la mitad del ozono sobre el Ártico. Calculamos que este descenso no se detendrá puesto que las condiciones que han provocado esta reducción rápida del ozono persistirán.» 

La reducción de la capa de ozono se produce por la descomposición de clorofluorocarbonos (CFC) antropogénicos en sustancias nocivas y destructoras de ozono cuando las condiciones ambientales son de frío extremo. 

La relación entre la pérdida de ozono y el cambio climático está clara desde hace tiempo y en ningún sitio es tan evidente como en el Ártico, donde los inviernos siguen alcanzando temperaturas extremas, lo que provoca pérdidas aún mayores de ozono. 

Al aumentar la concentración de gases de efecto invernadero, las capas más bajas de la atmósfera conservan la radiación térmica terrestre y se calientan. De este modo llega menos radiación a la estratosfera, lo que a su vez intensifica el enfriamiento y agrava la pérdida de ozono. 

No obstante, estos cambios no afectan sólo a la zona del Ártico. Las masas de aire expuestas a la pérdida de ozono sobre el Ártico pueden desplazarse hacia el sur, de forma que la capa de ozono, más delgada, ofrece una protección menor contra los rayos ultravioletas también en las latitudes medias. Por ello estos investigadores alertan a Europa de la importancia de protegerse contra los rayos ultravioletas cuando se expongan al sol esta primavera. 

Como nota positiva se puede reseñar que durante la segunda mitad de este siglo no se seguirá destruyendo ozono en grandes cantidades gracias al Protocolo de Montreal, un tratado internacional adoptado en 1987 que prohibió en todo el mundo la producción de CFC con el fin de proteger la capa de ozono. No obstante, los CFC emitidos durante las décadas anteriores no desaparecerán de la atmósfera en muchos decenios. 

Esto implica que la capa de ozono se recuperará a largo plazo gracias a las medidas políticas medioambientales adoptadas. Hasta entonces, su destino en el Ártico depende de la temperatura de la misma a una altitud cercana a los veinte kilómetros y por lo tanto queda muy ligado al clima de la Tierra. 

Los descubrimientos del proyecto RECONCILE se difundirán en un artículo que se publicará próximamente. 

El proyecto emplea un método exhaustivo que incluye experimentos en el laboratorio y sobre el terreno además de trabajos de modelización de procesos microfísicos y del transporte de sustancias químicas. 

Gracias a la creación y comprobación de parámetros fiables de los procesos clave que motivan la reducción de la capa de ozono ártica y a su aplicación en modelos de química climática a gran escala, los investigadores están más capacitados para realizar predicciones más certeras sobre el proceso de reducción de la capa de ozono y sobre su interacción con el cambio climático.

La obesidad infantil se hace fuerte en los países pobres


La obesidad infantil se hace fuerte en los países pobres
Hace poco más de dos décadas, las únicas imágenes infantiles que llegaban al primer mundo desde los lugares más desfavorecidos del planeta eran las de niños famélicos, con los huesos marcados en la piel. Hoy, la estampa ha cambiado mucho, pero no porque hayan disminuido las desigualdades económicas y sociales que dividen el mundo en dos. Sigue habiendo países pobres, pero sus pequeños han cambiado la extrema delgadez por el sobrepeso a causa de la expansión de las dietas hipercalóricas aunque bajas en nutrientes, el aumento del sedentarismo y el abandono creciente de la lactancia materna.
FUENTE | El Mundo Digital18/03/2011
En África, el número de niños menores de cinco años con obesidad ha pasado de los cuatro millones que se contabilizaban en 1990, a los 13,5 millones que se registraron en 2010, lo que supone un aumento espectacular para esa franja de edad. Asia ha seguido la misma tendencia ya que, en el mismo periodo, los porcentajes en el continente crecieron desde el 3,2% al 4,9%.

Estas preocupantes cifras han centrado uno de los debates que mantiene en Ginebra (Suiza) el Comité de Expertos en Guías para la Nutrición de la Organización Mundial de la Salud.

"La razón por la cual los niños se convierten en obesos es que son menos activos y que los alimentos que consumen superan sus necesidades calóricas", ha explicado Francesco Branca, miembro del comité cuyo objetivo es combatir las múltiples caras que tiene la malnutrición hoy en día. 

"Constatamos que en los países emergentes, ha aumentado la oferta de alimentos industriales que, generalmente, contienen muchos azúcares y grasas", ha subrayado.

A este cambio en la dieta se suma, además, una tendencia a la baja de la lactancia materna en los países en desarrollo, lo que, unido a una alimentación insuficiente de las madres, termina por completar un preocupante perfil de riesgo para los menores.

"La malnutrición es responsable del 11% de todas las enfermedades, causa problemas de salud a largo plazo y minusvalías", ha subrayado Branca, quien también ha recordado que las carencias alimenticias "ejercen un impacto sobre la educación y el desarrollo de los niños de los países más vulnerables". 

Reunido, el Comité deberá elaborar nuevas recomendaciones globales para mejorar los problemas nutricionales que padecen cientos de millones de personas en todo el mundo. 

Radiation Spread Seen; Frantic Repairs Go On


Radiation Spread Seen; Frantic Repairs Go On

Kyodo News, via Associated Press
Fire trucks converged in preparation for spraying water at the Fukushima nuclear plant, in Iwaki, on Friday. More Photos »
WASHINGTON — The first readings from American data-collection flights over the stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in northeastern Japan show that the worst contamination has not spread beyond the 19-mile range of highest concern established by Japanese authorities.
1 of 5
The Destruction and Aftermath
Photos of the unfolding disaster in Japan.
    Multimedia

    Readers' Comments

    Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
    But another day of frantic efforts to cool nuclear fuel in the troubled reactors and in the plant’s spent-fuel pools resulted in little or no progress, according to United States government officials.
    Japanese officials said they would continue those efforts, but were also racing to restore electric power to the site to get equipment going again, leaving open the question of why that effort did not begin days ago, at the first signs that the critical backup cooling systems for the reactors had failed.
    The data was collected by the Aerial Measuring System, among the most sophisticated devices rushed to Japan by the Obama administration in an effort to help contain a nuclear crisis that a top American nuclear official said Thursday could go on for weeks.
    Strapped onto a plane and a helicopter that the United States flew over the site, with Japanese permission, the equipment took measurements that showed harmful radiation in the immediate vicinity of the plant — a much heavier dose than the trace levels of radioactive particles that make up the atmospheric plume covering a much wider area.
    While the findings were reassuring in the short term, the United States declined to back away from its warning to Americans there to stay at least 50 miles from the plant, setting up a far larger perimeter than the Japanese government had established. American officials did not release specific radiation readings.
    American officials said their biggest worry was that a frenetic series of efforts by the Japanese military to get water into four of the plant’s six reactors — including using water cannons and firefighting helicopters that dropped water but appeared to largely miss their targets — showed few signs of working.
    “This is something that will likely take some time to work through, possibly weeks, as eventually you remove the majority of the heat from the reactors and then the spent fuel pool,” said Gregory Jaczko, the chairman of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, briefing reporters at the White House.
    The effort by the Japanese to hook some electric power back up to the plant did not begin until Thursday and even if they succeed, it is unclear whether the cooling systems, in reactor buildings battered by a tsunami and then torn apart by hydrogen explosions, survived the crisis in good enough shape to be useful.
    “What you are seeing are desperate efforts — just throwing everything at it in hopes something will work,” said one American official with long nuclear experience who would not speak for attribution. “Right now this is more prayer than plan.”
    On Thursday, President Obama said that the crisis had convinced him to order the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to do a comprehensive review of the safety of nuclear plants in the United States.
    After a day in which American and Japanese officials gave radically different assessments of the danger from the nuclear plant, the two governments tried on Thursday to join forces.
    Experts met in Tokyo to compare notes. The United States, with Japanese permission, began to put the intelligence-collection aircraft over the site, in hopes of gaining a view for Washington as well as its allies in Tokyo that did not rely on the announcements of officials from the Tokyo Electric Power Company, which operates Fukushima Daiichi.
    American officials say they suspect that the company has consistently underestimated the risk and moved too slowly to contain the damage.
    Aircraft normally used to monitor North Korea’s nuclear weapons activities — a Global Hawk drone and U-2 spy planes — were flying missions over the reactor, trying to help the Japanese government map out its response to last week’s 9.0-magnitude earthquake, the tsunami that followed and now the nuclear disaster.
    President Obama made an unscheduled stop at the Japanese Embassy to sign a condolence book, writing, “My heart goes out to the people of Japan during this enormous tragedy.” He added, “Because of the strength and wisdom of its people, we know that Japan will recover, and indeed will emerge stronger than ever.”
    Later, he appeared in the Rose Garden at the White House to offer continued American support for the earthquake and tsunami victims, and technical help at the nuclear site.
    But before the recovery can begin, the nuclear plant must be brought under control. On Friday, steam that was likely laced with radioactive particles was again rising over the plant, this time billowing from reactor No. 2, which suffered an explosion Tuesday. But Japanese authorities said they did not yet know the cause of the latest release.

    American officials, meanwhile, remained fixated on the temperature readings inside that reactor and two others that had been operating until the earthquake shut them down, as well as at the plant’s spent fuel pools, looking for any signs that their high levels of heat were going down. If the fuel rods are uncovered and exposed to air, they heat up and can burst into flames, spewing radioactive elements.
    So far the officials saw no signs of dropping temperatures. And the Web site of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations nuclear watchdog, made it clear that there were no readings at all from some critical areas. Part of the American effort, by satellites and aircraft, is to identify the hot spots, something the Japanese have not been able to do in some cases.
    Critical to that effort are the “pods” flown into Japan by the Air Force over the past day. Made for quick assessments of radiation emergencies, the Aerial Measuring System is an instrument system that fits on a helicopter or fixed-wing aircraft to sample air and survey the land below.
    Daniel B. Poneman, the deputy secretary of energy, said at a White House briefing on Thursday that preliminary results of the initial flights “are consistent with the recommendations that came down from the chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,” which led to the 50-mile evacuation guideline given to American expatriates. Although the worst contamination is closer to the plant, the recommendation takes into account the possibility of shifting winds or greater emissions.
    The State Department has also said it would fly out of the country any dependents of American diplomats or military personnel within the region of the plant and as far south as Tokyo. Space will be made for other Americans who cannot get a flight, it said.
    Getting the Japanese to accept the American detection equipment was a delicate diplomatic maneuver, which some Japanese officials originally resisted. But as it became clear that conditions at the plant were spinning out of control, and with Japanese officials admitting they had little hard evidence about whether there was water in the cooling pools or breaches in the reactor containment structures, they began to accept more help.
    The sensors on the instrument pod are good at mapping radioactive isotopes, like cesium 137, which has been detected around the nuclear plant and has a half-life of 30 years. In high doses, it can cause acute radiation sickness. Lower doses can alter cellular function, leading to an increased risk of cancer.
    Cesium 137 can enter the body through many foods, including milk.
    On Wednesday, when the American Embassy in Tokyo, on advice from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, told Americans to evacuate a radius of “approximately 50 miles” around the Fukushima plant, the recommendation was based on a specific calculation of risk of radioactive fallout in the affected area.
    In a statement, the commission said the advice grew out of its assessment that projected radiation doses within the evacuation zone might exceed one rem to the body or five rems to the thyroid gland. That organ is extremely sensitive to iodine 131 — another of the deadly byproducts of nuclear fuel, this one causing thyroid cancer.
    The commission says that the average American is exposed to about 0.62 rem of radiation each year from natural and manmade sources.
    The American-provided instruments in Japan measure real levels of radiation on the ground. In contrast, scientists around the world have also begun to draw up forecasts of how the prevailing winds pick up the Japanese radioactive material and carry it over the Pacific in invisible plumes.
    Private analysts said the United States was also probably monitoring the reactor crisis with spy satellites that can spot the heat from fires — helping it independently assess the state of the reactor complex from a distance.
    Jeffrey G. Lewis, an intelligence specialist at the Monterey Institute, a research center, noted that the Japanese assessment of Reactor No. 4 at the Daiichi complex seemed to depend in part on visual surveillance by helicopter pilots.
    “I’ve got to think that, if we put our best assets into answering that question, we can do better,” he said in an interview.
    One main concern at No. 4 has been a fire that was burning there earlier in the week; American officials are not convinced that the fire has gone out.
    American officials have also worried that the spent-fuel pool at that reactor has run dry, exposing the rods. Japanese officials, however, have concentrated much of their recent efforts on Reactor No. 3, which has been intermittently releasing radiation from what the authorities believe may be a ruptured containment vessel around the reactor. Temperatures at that reactor’s spent fuel pool are also high.
    Perhaps because of the difficulties experienced Thursday trying to accurately drop water from helicopters, the Japanese military announced Friday that it was halting those efforts for at least a day.
    David E. Sanger reported from Washington, and William J. Broad from New York. Thom Shanker contributed reporting from Washington and Hiroko Tabuchi from Tokyo
    .

    Protocolos

    Protocolos

    Protocolo diagnóstico y valoración de las crisis epilépticas en el medio extrahospitalario

    pulse sobre visualizar documento

    Protocolo diagnóstico y terapéutico del status epilepticus
    pulse sobre visualizar documento

    Criterios de ingreso hospitalario y derivación al especialista.

    Aspectos laborales, conducción de vehículos y actividades de riesgo en pacientes con epilepsia

    pulse sobre visualizar documento

    Indicaciones del electroencefalograma en la epilepsiapulse sobre visualizar documento

    Protocolo diagnóstico diferencial de la pérdida de conciencia transitoria

    pulse sobre visualizar documento 

    Radiación nuclear


    Radiation reactor incidents
    US Department of Health and Human Services

    Radiation reactor incidents occur almost exclusively at well-characterized fixed facilities, like nuclear reactors or nuclear power plants, or along prescribed transit routes when radioactive materials are moved.
    Typically, facility operators and local officials have formal response plans and practice response operations.
    For accidents at fixed facilities, like a nuclear power plant, there is likely to be a window of time before the release of radiation starts, as opposed to an improvised nuclear device (IND) or a nuclear bomb, which may be initiated without any advanced warning

    Radiación nuclear
    Javier Aragón Navarro
    4 de Noviembre del 2008
    Introducción
    Radiación: Energía ondulatoria o partículas materiales que se propagan a través del espacio. El ser humano ha estado expuesto a las radiaciones ionizantes desde su aparición sobre la Tierra, pero sólo fue capaz de identicarlas y usarlas desde el momento, en 1895, en que Wilhelm Konrad Roentgen descubrió los rayos X. Durante casi un siglo se ha trabajado para profundizar el conocimiento y ampliar las aplicaciones de la radiación y otras nuevas formas de la energía, y aumentar así nuestro dominio sobre las fuerzas de la naturaleza. La dualidad en los usos de la radiación, para fines benéficos o destructivos, fue imaginada desde el principio por sus descubridores. Cuando Pierre Curie en Estocolmo recibió con su esposa Marie el premio Nobel en 1903 señaló: "Soy de aquellos que piensan que la humanidad obtendrá más beneficio que daño con estos nuevos descubrimientos." En esta frase queda implícito que estaba consciente de que sus descubrimientos podrían dañar a la humanidad pero confiaba
     en que los beneficios serían mucho mayores. Casi noventa años después debemos aceptar que así ha sido
    .

    Concentración actual de radionucleidos artificiales y las dosis estimadas de radiación de cesio 137 alrededor de la central nuclear de Chernóbil, la prueba nuclear de Semipalatinsk  y en Nagasaki.
    Current concentration of artificial radionuclides and estimated radiation doses from 137Cs around the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Testing Site, and in Nagasaki.
    Taira Y, Hayashida N, Brahmanandhan GM, Nagayama Y, Yamashita S, Takahashi J, Gutevitc A, Kazlovsky A, Urazalin M, Takamura N.
    Department of Radiation Epidemiology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
    J Radiat Res (Tokyo). 2011;52(1):88-95. Epub 2010 Dec 24.

    Abstract
    To evaluate current environmental contamination and contributions from internal and external exposure due to the accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (CNPP) and nuclear tests at the Semipalatinsk Nuclear Testing Site (SNTS), concentrations of artificial radionuclides in edible mushrooms, soils and stones from each area were analyzed by gamma spectrometry. Annual effective doses were calculated for each area from the cesium contamination. Calculated internal effective doses of (137)Cs due to ingestion of mushrooms were 1.8 × 10(-1) mSv/year (y) in Gomel city (around CNPP), 1.7 × 10(-1) mSv/y in Korosten city (around CNPP), 2.8 × 10(-4) mSv/y in Semipalatinsk city, and 1.3 × 10(-4) mSv/y in Nagasaki. Calculated external effective doses of (137)Cs were 3.4 × 10(-2) mSv/y in Gomel city, 6.2 × 10(-2) mSv/y in Korosten city, 2.0 × 10(-4) mSv/y in Semipalatinsk city, and 1.3 × 10(-4) mSv/y in Nagasaki. Distribution of radionuclides in stones collected beside Lake Balapan (in SNTS) were (241)Am (49.4 ± 1.4 Bq/kg), (137)Cs (406.3 ± 1.7 Bq/kg), (58)Co (3.2 ± 0.5 Bq/kg), and (60)Co (125.9 ± 1.1 and 126.1 ± 1.1 Bq/kg). The present study revealed that dose rates from internal and external exposure around CNPP were not sufficiently low and radiation exposure potency still exists even though current levels are below the public dose limit of 1 mSv/y (ICRP1991). Moreover, parts of the SNTS area may be still contaminated by artificial radionuclides derived from nuclear tests. Long-term follow-up of environmental monitoring around CNPP and SNTS, as well as evaluation of health effects in the population residing around these areas, may contribute to radiation safety with a reduction of unnecessary exposure of residents.


    Atentamente
    Anestesiología y Medicina del Dolor