martes, 8 de diciembre de 2015

Pregabalina / Pregabalin



 Dilemas en la premedicación. ¿Es pregabalina la respuesta?
Premedication dilemmas, is Pregabalin the answer?
J Res Pharm Pract. 2015 Jul-Sep;4(3):142-6. doi: 10.4103/2279-042X.162364.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Laryngoscopy and intubation are associated with sympathetic stimulation which can prove deleterious in patients with cardiovascular compromise; so, various methods have been tried to obtund this pressor response. In this study, we have assessed the efficacy of pregabalin in attenuating the pressor response to laryngoscopy and intubation. METHODS: This prospective randomized study included 80 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status grades I-II, in the age group of 18-60 years of age. The patients were randomized into two groups of 40 patients each. Group A received the placebo orally, 90 min prior to surgery. Group B received 150 mg of pregabalin orally, 90 min prior to surgery. These patients were assessed in terms of sedation with Ramsay sedation scale (RSS). In the operation theatre, the heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and oxygen saturation recorded at baseline and 1, 3, 5, and 10 min after intubation. The rate pressure product (RPP) was calculated for these time intervals. In the postoperative period, patients were assessed for complications like dizziness, nausea, and blurred vision. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square and ANOVA tests. FINDINGS: The group receiving 150 mg of pregabalin as premedication was found to be adequately sedated at 1 h post-premedication with 52% patients having a RSS score of 3 compared to 4% with the same RSS score in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). Hemodynamics was more stable post-intubation with significant stability in the HR (P = 0.002) and RPP (P = 0.004) in the pregabalin group. CONCLUSION: Pregabalin when given as a premedication provides adequate sedation and obtunds the pressor response seen with intubation.
KEYWORDS: Laryngoscopy; Pregabalin; Ramsay sedation scale; pressor response; rate pressure product
 
     XII Congreso Virtual Mexicano de Anestesiologia


          
Anestesiología y Medicina del Dolor
52 664 6848905
vwhizar@anestesia-dolor.org
anestesia-dolor.org

Copyright © 2015

Bibliotecas populares. Noticias





bibliotecas populares
Notificaciones semanales ⋅ 2 de diciembre de 2015
NOTICIAS


El Tribuno.com.ar

Bibliotecas populares cierran el año con una nutrida agenda
El Tribuno.com.ar
Las diferentes bibliotecas populares que funcionan en la ciudad de Salta ya están cerrando con actividades especiales un año que fue muy fructífero.



Propone desarrollar diversos proyectos para el próximo año
Nuevo Diario de Santiago del Estero
Las bibliotecas populares son dirigidas y sostenidas principalmente por sus socios y brindan información, educación, recreación y animación ...

Ventilación protectiva en pacientes sin ARDS/Protective ventilation in patients without ARDS

Diciembre 8, 2015. No. 2169

PReVENT-ventilación protectiva en pacientes sin ARDS al inicio de la ventilación. Protocolo de estudio para un ensayo aleatorizado y controlado
PReVENT--protective ventilation in patients without ARDS at start of ventilation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trials. 2015 May 24;16:226. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0759-1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether lung-protective mechanical ventilation using low tidal volumes should be used in all critically ill patients, irrespective of the presence of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). A low tidal volume strategy includes use of higher respiratory rates, which could be associated with increased sedation needs, a higher incidence of delirium, and an increased risk of patient-ventilator asynchrony and ICU-acquired weakness. Another alleged side-effect of low tidal volume ventilation is the risk of atelectasis. All of these could offset the beneficial effects of low tidal volume ventilation as found in patients with ARDS.METHODS/DESIGN: PReVENT is a national multicenter randomized controlled trial in invasively ventilated ICU patients without ARDS with an anticipated duration of ventilation of longer than 24 hours in 5 ICUs in The Netherlands. Consecutive patients are randomly assigned to a low tidal volume strategy using tidal volumes from 4 to 6 ml/kg predicted body weight (PBW) or a high tidal volume ventilation strategy using tidal volumes from 8 to 10 ml/kg PBW. The primary endpoint is the number of ventilator-free days and alive at day 28. Secondary endpoints include ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU and hospital mortality, the incidence of pulmonary complications, including ARDS, pneumonia, atelectasis, and pneumothorax, the cumulative use and duration of sedatives and neuromuscular blocking agents, incidence of ICU delirium, and the need for decreasing of instrumental dead space.DISCUSSION: PReVENT is the first randomized controlled trial comparing a low tidal volume strategy with a high tidal volume strategy, in patients without ARDS at onset of ventilation, that recruits a sufficient number of patients to test the hypothesis that a low tidal volume strategy benefits patients without ARDS with regard to a clinically relevant endpoint.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov under reference numberNCT02153294 on 23 May 2014.

          
Anestesiología y Medicina del Dolor
52 664 6848905
vwhizar@anestesia-dolor.org
anestesia-dolor.org

Copyright © 2015

lunes, 7 de diciembre de 2015

Casa Perioperatoria de Cirugía/Perioperative Surgical Home


De regreso a lo básico. La ¨Casa Perioperatoria de Cirugía¨
Back to Basics: The Perioperative Surgical Home.
AORN J. 2015 Sep;102(3):262-6; quiz 267-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2015.06.012.
Abstract
The Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) is designed to improve care for patients, decrease health care costs, and transform the way in which clinicians deliver primary care. The PCMH is a model for primary care delivery that encompasses comprehensive patient-centered care that is coordinated across all settings and provides accessible services and community support as needed with shorter wait times, enhanced hours, and around-the-clock telephone or electronic access for patient needs. In addition, providers use evidence-based practice and clinical decision support tools to provide the best possible care to patients. This article discusses how the model originated and provides a how-to guide and strategies for success in implementing this model of care.
     XII Congreso Virtual Mexicano de Anestesiologia


          
Anestesiología y Medicina del Dolor
52 664 6848905
vwhizar@anestesia-dolor.org
anestesia-dolor.org

Copyright © 2015

Relajantes neuromusculares en UCI/Neuromuscular blocking agents in ICU

Diciembre 7 2015. No. 2168

Relajantes neuromusculares en pacientes con ARDS. Sumario de las evidencias actuales de tres estudios aleatorizados y controlados
Neuromuscular blocking agents in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a summary of the current evidence from three randomized controlled trials.
Ann Intensive Care. 2012 Jul 26;2(1):33. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-33.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of NMBA in the early phase of ARDS improves outcome.
Mejor evidencia en cuidados intensivos. Papel de los relajantes neuromusculares en la etapa temprana del síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda
Best evidence in critical care medicine: The role of neuromuscular blocking drugs in early severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Can J Anaesth. 2012 Jan;59(1):105-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9615-2. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment in early severe ARDS with the NMBA, cisatracurium, for 48 hr was associated with lower adjusted 90-day mortality. It was also associated with decreased morbidity, which included increased ventilator-free days, increased ICU-free days, and increased organ failure-free days. These benefits occurred without increasing the incidence of ICU-acquired weakness.
Sedación y parálisis
Sedation and paralysis.
Respir Care. 2013 Jun;58(6):1024-37. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02232.
Abstract
Sedation is used almost universally in the care of critically ill patients, especially in those who require mechanical ventilatory support or other life-saving invasive procedures. This review will focus on the sedation strategies for critically ill patients and the pharmacology of commonly used sedative agents. The role of neuromuscular blocking agents in the ICU will be examined and the pharmacology of commonly used agents is reviewed. Finally a strategy for rational use of these sedative and neuromuscular blocking agents in critically ill patients will be proposed.
KEYWORDS: critical illness; mechanical ventilation; neuromuscular blocking agent; sedation; sedatives
 

          
Anestesiología y Medicina del Dolor
52 664 6848905
vwhizar@anestesia-dolor.org
anestesia-dolor.org

Copyright © 2015