jueves, 21 de junio de 2012

Notiweb


Comunidad de Madrid. La Suma de Todos   Boletín informativo 'diariodeSol'
madri+d Facebookmadri+d Twittermadri+d Twittermadri+d rssmadri+d youtube
NOTIWEB MADRI+D · BOLETÍN DE NOTICIAS DE I+D 21/06/2012
NÚMERO DE SUSCRIPTORES: 60338
"Es más fácil negar las cosas que enterarse de ellas" (LARRA, MARIANO JOSÉ DE) 1809-1837
Más de 30 años de datos sobre la humedad del suelo para el estudio del clima

El agua almacenada en el suelo juega un papel muy importante en el sistema climático. La ESA presenta el primer catálogo global de datos sobre la humedad del suelo correspondientes al periodo 1978-2010 un precursor de la información que continúa recopilando la misión SMOS de la ESA.
Crean una cámara de 50 gigapíxeles, cinco veces más precisa que la visión humana

Una cámara de 50 gigapíxeles. O lo que es lo mismo, de 50.000 megapíxeles. Un dispositivo capaz de conseguir imágenes con un detalle sin precedentes.
LinktoGrowUp, una nueva aceleradora para startups en fase de crecimiento

La fiebre de las aceleradoras ya tiene un nuevo agente: linktoGrowUp, un programa de aceleración hermano del ya famoso LinktoStart.
La posibilidad de una tundra ártica verde en el futuro

Los suelos en regiones situadas en latitudes elevadas almacenan más carbono que el que contiene la atmósfera. Además, en el Ártico también se sufre el aumento de la temperatura que se produce en el resto del planeta.
Carver Mead: Los investigadores que no tienen contacto con el mundo comercial se arriesgan a quedar obsoletos y a perder muchas oportunidades

El ingeniero electrónico Carver Mead, Premio Fundación BBVA Fronteras del Conocimiento en Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación (TIC), nunca ha percibido en su carrera "una frontera muy marcada entre la investigación básica y las aplicaciones".
Cuanto más creativos, más ricos

El informe que presenta en Bruselas la Universitat de València sostiene que el tamaño de los sectores culturales y creativos es “la variable más determinante para explicar las diferencias de renta per cápita de las regiones Europeas”.
La hormona que despierta el cerebro

Un grupo de investigadores españoles ha descubierto una nueva función del neurotransmisor dopamina en el control de la regulación del sueño. Sus resultados podrían servir para avanzar en el conocimiento de los trastornos del sueño y desarrollar nuevos medicamentos.
Un cráter del polo sur de la Luna podría albergar depósitos de hielo

El cráter Shackleton, cercano al polo sur de la Luna, podría albergar hielo, según un equipo de investigadores estadounidenses que aún no ha podido demostrar su existencia, informó la revista científica "Nature".
Pastores africanos ya ordeñaban el ganado hace 7.000 años

Los seres humanos domesticaban a sus animales y ya ordeñaban al ganado hace cerca de 7.000 años en el África subsahariana, según una investigación publicada en la revista «Nature» por un equipo internacional de científicos liderado por la Universidad de Bristol (Reino Unido).
Charles Lawrie: Detectaremos los cánceres con análisis de sangre

Entrevista a Charles Lawrie, doctor en Biología procedente de la Universidad de Oxford e investigador de Ikerbasque, trabaja en Biodonostia, el único centro dedicado exclusivamente a las investigaciones biomédicas en el País Vasco.
Blog del día: Los avances de la química y su impacto en la sociedad. Resveratrol y (la falsa) longevidad

El resveratrol es un componente del vino tinto (y de otros alimentos) que se ha calificado como la molécula de la eterna juventud; comercializándose con el llamativo eslogan 'elixir de la eterna juventud' (y frases similares).
mi+d tvcanalesemprendedores7PM
VIII Premios madri+d

MEJOR PROYECTO EUROPEO DE I+D EN COOPERACIÓN

Mejor Proyecto Europeo de I+D en Cooperación ex aequo

Accésits
"La energía solar está llamada a ser una de las más importantes fuentes de electricidad del siglo XXI"
Antonio Luque. Catedrático de UPM y fundador del Instituto de Energía Solar. Coordinador del proyecto NGCPV
"La participación en el 7PM ha permitido construir un equipo multidisciplinar internacional basado en la confianza mutua y la colaboración"
Antonio Tenorio. Investigador del Centro Nacional de Microbiología del Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Coordinador del Proyecto EuroWestNile

Ceremonia de entrega

Excelencia y calidad


Más allá de la competencia: definiendo y promoviendo la excelencia en anestesiología
Beyond competence: defining and promoting excellence in anaesthesia.
Smith AF, Greaves JD.
Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Lancaster Infirmary, Lancaster, UK.andrew.f.smith@mbht.nhs.uk
Anaesthesia. 2010 Feb;65(2):184-91. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
Abstract
Recent trends in medical training have tended to focus on competence, in the sense of adequate performance, rather than excellence. This article reviews published literature and relevant concepts relating to excellence and professionalism from within anaesthesia, from medicine more generally and from outside the profession. A number of conceptual frameworks are presented that could be adapted for the promotion of excellence, and some of the necessary prerequisites for this promotion discussed.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06162.x/pdf 
 
Mejorando la calidad en la educación médica: estado actual y futuras direcciones
Quality improvement in medical education: current state and future directions
Brian M Wong, Wendy Levinson, Kaveh G Shojania.
Medical Education 2012: 46: 107-119
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04154.x
CONTEXT. During the last decade, there has been a drive to improve the quality of patient care and prevent the occurrence of avoidable errors. This review describes current efforts to teach or engage trainees in patient safety and quality improvement (QI), summarises progress to date, as well as successes and challenges, and lists our recommendations for the next steps that will shape the future of patient safety and QI in medical education.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04154.x/pdf 
Atentamente
Anestesiología y Medicina del Dolor

Bibliofilia


La fotógrafa y pintora Ouka Leele expone en el Casyc 70 de sus ...
elEconomista.es
Libros de bibliofilia; mosaicos de flores; retratos de ella desnuda; y un vídeo en el que se muestra cómo realizó el mural de 300 metros cuadrados 'Mi ...
El Beato de Ginebra recibe el Premio Nacional de Facsímil mejor ...
Correo de Burgos
... en la Modalidad de Libros Facsímiles, a la reproducción del Beato de Ginebra realizado por la editorial burgalesa Siloé Arte y Bibliofilia.
La fotógrafa y pintora Ouka Leele expone en el Casyc 70 de sus ...
20minutos.es
... entre ellas retratos, fotografías, poemas, polaroids gigantes o libros de bibliofilia. Ouka Leele ha presentado la exposición este viernes en una rueda ...
Más de dos mil grabados de Posada reúne la colección de Mercurio López
La Crónica de Hoy
... pues el tiempo lo ha puesto al frente de la librería Bibliofilia, ubicada en la mítica calle Donceles del Centro Histórico, desde donde sostiene una ...
Cuando un libro cuesta 10.000 euros
Cinco Días
"Son clientes interesados en la bibliofilia y coleccionistas de arte. Pero también se deben incluir a aquellos más acotados por tema, como los fans de The ...

 
¿Bibliofilia? ¿Bibliomanía? | Leamos Más
La Bibliofilia es el amor por los libros; y el bibliófilo es el amante o aficionado a las ediciones originales de ciertos libros, a los empastes especiales, al aroma ...
www.leamosmas.com/2012/06/que-hace-bibliofilo/
BIBLIOTYPES: BIBLIOFILIA Y PAPYRUS: DOS REVISTAS DE ...
La Revista BIBLIOFILIA la Publicó Ramón Miquel y Planas en Barcelona. El primer volumen entre los años 1911 y 1914 y el segundo volumen entre los años ...
bibliotypes.blogspot.com/.../bibliofilia-y-papyrus-dos-revistas-...

Banda ancha e inclusión social: ¿ahora sí?

http://blog.pucp.edu.pe/item/161409/banda-ancha-e-inclusion-social-ahora-si

Banda ancha e inclusión social: ¿ahora sí?

Por Aurora de la Vega
20120621-applications-internet.png


La Comisión de Banda Ancha para el Desarrollo Digital, establecida en mayo de 2010 por la Unión Internacional de la Telecomunicaciones (ITU) y laUNESCO, ha dirigido recientemente una carta abierta a los líderes mundiales, políticos y ciudadanos que asistieron recientemente a la reunión de líderes del G20 en México, en la que pide su apoyo al desarrollo de la infraestructura de banda ancha y sus aplicaciones. La carta señala que, como el agua, las carreteras, el ferrocarril y la electricidad, la banda ancha es de fundamental importancia para el desarrollo social y económico de todas las naciones. Sin embargo, advierte que las inversiones no deben centrarse sólo en la infraestructura técnica sino también en la disponibilidad de contenidos relevantes, en aplicaciones y servicios en múltiples lenguas, en apoyo a los medios de comunicación, al desarrollo de la alfabetización informacional, para eliminar las desigualdades y lograr a través de la banda ancha la inclusión para todos. La carta también hace referencia a la necesidad de que el desarrollo socioeconómico sostenible incluya los cuatro pilares de las sociedades del conocimiento: libertad de expresión, educación de calidad para todos, acceso a la información y el conocimiento, y respeto a la diversidad lingüística y cultural.

Coincidentemente en el Perú, la semana pasada, el Congreso aprobó por amplia mayoría el proyecto de Ley de Promoción por el Estado de la Banda Ancha y la Construcción de la Red Dorsal Nacional de Fibra Óptica. Se dice que la norma permitirá una mayor velocidad en la transmisión de datos y beneficiará a un gran número de poblaciones que no tienen aún acceso a Internet en nuestro país. Será también de suma utilidad en escuelas, establecimientos de salud, comisarías, municipalidades, y otras instituciones del estado, especialmente aquellas que se encuentran alejadas de las grandes ciudades.

La falta de conexión a Internet en la mayoría de nuestras bibliotecas públicas, escolares y aún universitarias, en el marco de una prolongada situación de postración, nos hace tomar la noticia con cierto pesimismo y preguntarnos, a la vez, cuánto del beneficio anunciado por esta ley y cuánto del pedido de ITU y UNESCO se hará realidad y podrá llegar a las bibliotecas en un corto o mediano plazo. Es cierto que el problema que las aqueja no se soluciona únicamente con conectividad y rapidez en la transmisión, pero también es cierto que este avance puede contribuir a romper el aislamiento y facilitar intercambios provechosos. Aguardemos atentos y con cautelosa esperanza que la norma recién aprobada entre en vigencia, para así observar si Internet va incorporándose a todas las bibliotecas de nuestro país, como es nuestro deseo, para facilitar el cumplimiento de objetivos tan importantes como dar acceso a la información y al conocimiento y plasmar el derecho a la educación y la cultura de todo ciudadano.

Infección por Gram negativos que hay de nuevo en México


  Estimado Pediatra  te invito al Seminario de Pediatría, Cirugía Pediátrica y Lactancia Materna. Programa 2012, el día 27 de junio    las 21hrs (Centro, México DF, Guadalajara y Lima Perú) a la Conferencia:“Infección por Gram negativos que hay de nuevo en México ”  por  el  “Dr. Gerardo Martínez Aguilar” Infectólogo  Pediatra de la Cd. de Durango Dgo.   La sesión inicia puntualmente las 21 hrs. 
Para entrar a la Sala de Conferencia:
1.- hacer click en la siguiente liga, o cópiala y escríbela en tu buscador
2.- “Entra como Invitado” Escribes tu nombre y apellido en el espacio en blanco 
3.- Hacer click en el espacio que dice “Entrar en la Sala”
5.- A disfrutar la conferencia                                                                                                                            6.- Recomendamos que dejes tu Nombre Completo, Correo electrónico y que participes.

Henrys
 
Dr. Enrique Mendoza López
Webmaster: CONAPEME
Coordinador Nacional: Seminario Ciberpeds-Conapeme
Av La clinica 2520-310 
Colonia Sertoma ,Mty N.L. México
CP 64710
Tel-Fax 52 81 83482940 y 52 81 81146053
Celular 8183094806
www.conapeme.org
www.pediatramendoza.com
enrique@pediatramendoza.com
emendozal@yahoo.com.mx

Grabacion de la Conferencia: Espirometria como interpretarla en el consultorio


 Estimados amigos estas son las ligas de la grabacion de la conferencia de anoche
como interpretar Espirometria en el consultorio


Pagina de Conapeme: http://bit.ly/LolqgI
Pagina de Ciberpeds: http://bit.ly/JgI5hT

Pueden revisarla despacio y contesrar las preguntas enviarselas al  dr  David Camarena  para que les anote asistencia Of line

henrys

-- 
Dr. Enrique Mendoza López
Webmaster: CONAPEME
Coordinador Nacional: Seminario Ciberpeds-Conapeme
Av La Clinica 2520-310 col Sertoma
Monterrey N.L. CP 64718
Tel (81) 83482940, (81)81146053
 Cel 0448183094806
 



-- 
Dr. Enrique Mendoza López
Webmaster: CONAPEME
Coordinador Nacional: Seminario Ciberpeds-Conapeme
Av La Clinica 2520-310 col Sertoma
Monterrey N.L. CP 64718
Tel (81) 83482940, (81)81146053
 Cel 0448183094806
 

Dirtying Up Our Diets


OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

Dirtying Up Our Diets

OVER 7,000 strong and growing, community farmers’ markets are being heralded as a panacea for what ails our sick nation. The smell of fresh, earthy goodness is the reason environmentalists approve of them, locavores can’t live without them, and the first lady has hitched her vegetable cart crusade to them. As health-giving as those bundles of mouthwatering leafy greens and crates of plump tomatoes are, the greatest social contribution of the farmers’ market may be its role as a delivery vehicle for putting dirt back into the American diet and in the process, reacquainting the human immune system with some “old friends.”
Lauren Nassef
Opinion Twitter Logo.

Connect With Us on Twitter

For Op-Ed, follow@nytopinion and to hear from the editorial page editor, Andrew Rosenthal, follow@andyrNYT.
Increasing evidence suggests that the alarming rise in allergic andautoimmune disorders during the past few decades is at least partly attributable to our lack of exposure to microorganisms that once covered our food and us. As nature’s blanket, the potentially pathogenic and benign microorganisms associated with the dirt that once covered every aspect of our preindustrial day guaranteed a time-honored co-evolutionary process that established “normal” background levels and kept our bodies from overreacting to foreign bodies. This research suggests that reintroducing some of the organisms from the mud and water of our natural world would help avoid an overreaction of an otherwise healthy immune response that results in such chronic diseases as Type 1 diabetesinflammatory bowel diseasemultiple sclerosis and a host of allergic disorders.
In a world of hand sanitizer and wet wipes (not to mention double tall skinny soy vanilla lattes), we can scarcely imagine the preindustrial lifestyle that resulted in the daily intake of trillions of helpful organisms. For nearly all of human history, this began with maternal transmission of beneficial microbes during passage through the birth canal — mother to child. However, the alarming increase in the rate of Caesarean section births means a potential loss of microbiota from one generation to the next. And for most of us in the industrialized world, the microbial cleansing continues throughout life. Nature’s dirt floor has been replaced by tile; our once soiled and sooted bodies and clothes are cleaned almost daily; our muddy water is filtered and treated; our rotting and fermenting food has been chilled; and the cowshed has been neatly tucked out of sight. While these improvements in hygiene and sanitation deserve applause, they have inadvertently given rise to a set of truly human-made diseases.
While comforting to the germ-phobic public, the too-shiny produce and triple-washed and bagged leafy greens in our local grocery aisle are hardly recognized by our immune system as food. The immune system is essentially a sensory mechanism for recognizing microbial challenges from the environment. Just as your tongue and nose are used to sense suitability for consumption, your immune system has receptors for sampling the environment, rigorous mechanisms for dealing with friend or foe, and a memory. Your immune system even has the capacity to learn.
For all of human history, this learning was driven by our near-continuous exposure from birth and throughout life to organisms as diverse as mycobacteria from soil and food; helminth, or worm parasites, from just about everywhere you turned; and daily recognition and challenges from our very own bacteria. Our ability to regulate our allergic and inflammatory responses to these co-evolved companions is further compromised by imbalances in the gut microbiota from overzealous use of antibiotics (especially in early childhood) and modern dietary choices.
The suggestion that we embrace some “old friends” does not immediately imply that we are inviting more food-borne illness — quite the contrary. Setting aside for the moment the fact that we have the safest food supply in human history, the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and food processing plants and farmers continue to take the blame for the tainted food that makes us ill, while our own all-American sick gut may deserve some blame as well.
While the news media and litigators have our attention focused on farm-to-table food safety and disease surveillance, the biological question of why we got sick is all but ignored. And by asking why an individual’s natural defenses failed, we insert personal responsibility into our national food safety strategy and draw attention to the much larger public health crisis, of which illness from food-borne pathogens is but a symptom of our minimally challenged and thus overreactive immune system.
As humans have evolved, so, too, have our diseases. Autoimmune disease affects an estimated 50 million people at an annual cost of more than $100 billion. And the suffering and monetary costs are sure to grow. Maybe it’s time we talk more about human ecology when we speak of the broader environmental and ecological concerns of the day. The destruction of our inner ecosystem surely deserves more attention as global populations run gut-first into the buzz saw of globalization and its microbial scrubbing diet. But more important, we should seriously consider making evolutionary biology a basic science for medicine, or making its core principles compulsory in secondary education. Currently they are not.
As we move deeper into a “postmodern” era of squeaky-clean food and hand sanitizers at every turn, we should probably hug our local farmers’ markets a little tighter. They may represent our only connection with some “old friends” we cannot afford to ignore.
Jeff D. Leach is a science and archaeology writer and founder of the Human Food Project.

Bacteria Thrive in Inner Elbow; No Harm Done


Bacteria Thrive in Inner Elbow; No Harm Done

Published: May 23, 2008
The crook of your elbow is not just a plain patch of skin. It is a piece of highly coveted real estate, a special ecosystem, a bountiful home to no fewer than six tribes of bacteria. Even after you have washed the skin clean, there are still one million bacteria in every square centimeter.


But panic not. These are not bad bacteria. They are what biologists call commensals, creatures that eat at the same table with people to everyone’s mutual benefit. Though they were not invited to enjoy board and lodging in the skin of your inner elbow, they are giving something of value in return. They are helping to moisturize the skin by processing the raw fats it produces, says Julia A. Segre of the National Human Genome Research Institute.
Dr. Segre and colleagues report their discovery of the six tribes in a paper being published online on Friday in Genome Research. The research is part of the human microbiome project, microbiome meaning the entourage of all microbes that live in people.
The project is an ambitious government-financed endeavor to catalog the typical bacterial colonies that inhabit each niche in the human ecosystem.
The project is in its early stages but has already established that the bacteria in the human microbiome collectively possess at least 100 times as many genes as the mere 20,000 or so in the human genome.
Since humans depend on their microbiome for various essential services, including digestion, a person should really be considered a superorganism, microbiologists assert, consisting of his or her own cells and those of all the commensal bacteria. The bacterial cells also outnumber human cells by 10 to 1, meaning that if cells could vote, people would be a minority in their own body.
Dr. Segre reckons that there are at least 20 different niches for bacteria, and maybe many more, on the human skin, each with a characteristic set of favored commensals. The types of bacteria she found in the inner elbow are quite different from those that another researcher identified a few inches away, on the inner forearm. But each of the five people Dr. Segre sampled harbored much the same set of bacteria, suggesting that this set is specialized for the precise conditions of nutrients and moisture that prevail in the human elbow.
Microbiologists believe that humans and their commensal bacteria are continually adapting to one another genetically. The precision of this mutual accommodation is indicated by the presence of particular species of bacteria in different niches on the human body, as Dr. Segre has found with denizens of the elbow.
Other researchers have found that most gut bacteria belong to just 2 of the 70 known tribes of bacteria. The gut bacteria perform vital services like breaking down complex sugars in the diet and converting hydrogen, a byproduct of bacterial fermentation, to methane.
The nature of the gut tribes is heavily influenced by diet, according to a research team led by Ruth E. Ley and Dr. Jeffrey I. Gordon of the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. With the help of colleagues at the San Diego and St. Louis Zoos, Dr. Ley and Dr. Gordon scanned the gut microbes in the feces of people and 59 other species of mammal, including meat eaters, plant eaters and omnivores. Each of the three groups has a distinctive set of bacteria, they report Friday in Science, with the gut flora of people grouping with other omnivores.
Despite the vast changes that people have made to their diet through cooking and agriculture, their gut bacteria “don’t dramatically depart in composition from those of other omnivorous primates,” Dr. Gordon said.
This new view of people as superorganisms has emerged from the cheap methods of decoding DNA that are now available. Previously it was hard to study bacteria without growing them up into large colonies. But most bacteria are difficult to culture, so microbiologists could see only a small fraction of those present. Analyzing the total DNA in a microbial community sidesteps this problem and samples the genes of all bacterial species that are present.
The goals of the human microbiome project include analyzing the normal makeup of bacterial species in each niche on the human body. “The focus in microbiology has been on pathogenic bacteria, but we are trying to identify the commensal bacteria so that we can begin to understand what proteins they make and how they contribute to our health,” Dr. Segre said.
Another goal is to understand how pathogenic bacteria manage to usurp power from the tribes of beneficial commensals in the skin or gut, causing disease.
The lifetime of an individual bacterium in the human superorganism may be short, since millions are shed each day from the skin or gut. But the colonies may survive for a long time, cloning themselves briskly to replace members that are sacrificed. Just where these colonies come from and how long they last is not yet known. Dr. David A. Relman ofStanford University has tracked the gut flora of infants and finds their first colonists come from their mother. But after a few weeks, the babies acquired distinctive individual sets of bacteria, all except a pair of twins who had the same set. Dr. Relman said he was now trying to ascertain if the first colonists remain with an individual for many years.
Taking a broad spectrum antibiotic presumably wreaks devastation on one’s companion microbiome. If the microbiome is essential to survival, it is perhaps surprising that the drugs do not make more people ill. Dr. Relman said that perhaps there were subtle long-term consequences that had not yet been identified. Much the same set of bacteria recolonize the gut after a course of antibiotics, he said, suggesting that the makeup of the colony is important and that the body has ways of reconstituting it as before.

Our Microbiomes, Ourselves


GRAY MATTER

Our Microbiomes, Ourselves

Andrea Wan
IMAGINE a scientist gently swabs your left nostril with a Q-tip and finds that your nose contains hundreds of species of bacteria. That in itself is no surprise; each of us is home to some 100 trillion microbes. But then she makes an interesting discovery: in your nose is a previously unknown species that produces a powerful new antibiotic. Her university licenses it to a pharmaceutical company; it hits the market and earns hundreds of millions of dollars. Do you deserve a cut of the profits?
It is a tricky question, because it defies our traditional notions of property and justice. You were not born with the germ in your nose; at some point in your life, it infected you. On the other hand, that microbe may be able to grow and reproduce only in a human nose. You provided it with an essential shelter. And its antibiotics may help keep you healthy, by killing disease-causing germs that attempt to invade your nose.
Welcome to the confusing new frontier of ethics: our inner ecosystem. In recent years, scientists have discovered remarkable complexity and power in the microbes that live inside us. We depend on this so-called microbiome for our well-being: it helps break down our food, synthesize vitamins and shield against disease-causing germs.
“We used to think of ourselves as separate from nature,” said Rosamond Rhodes, a bioethicist at Mount Sinai School of Medicine. “Now it’s not just us. It’s us and them.”
For bioethicists, one of the most important questions is what our microbes can reveal about ourselves. Studies have revealed, for example, that people who are sick with certain diseases tend to have distinctive collections of microbes. Someday we may get important clues to people’s health from a survey of their microbes. Professor Rhodes argues that this sort of information will deserve the same protection as information about our own genes. Your germs are your own business, in other words.
But that is only one side of the issue. As scientists get to know the microbiome better, they are also looking for new medical treatments: after all, most antibiotics were first discovered in bacteria and fungi. Michael Fischbach, a biologist at the University of California, San Francisco, and his colleagues have discovered a wealth of promising druglike molecules made by microbes in human bodies.
It may even be possible to use the bacteria themselves as living drugs. Doctors have treated hundreds of patients suffering from gut infections by giving them so-called fecal transplants: the bacteria from healthy people can create a stable ecosystem that drives disease-causing microbes to extinction. In their more speculative moments, scientists have proposed using microbes to treat obesity or autoimmune diseases. Some researchers are even genetically engineering microbes to make them more effective.
Manufacturers already add beneficial bacteria, called probiotics, to a range of foods. But regulating a microbe is trickier than regulating a molecule. Probiotics can multiply inside us, and can later escape to colonize new hosts. When a doctor prescribes engineered microbes for individual patients, the ethical questions will extend far beyond them, to their families and communities.
Microbes defy a simple notion of individuality. They are essential to our biology, and they travel with us from birth to death. Yet they also flow between us, and can be found in water, food and soil.
One important rule for microbiome ethics is to be transparent with the people involved in scientific studies. “The key is respectful interaction,” said Kieran O’Doherty of The University of Guelph outside Toronto. That’s particularly important when scientists travel to poor communities to collect microbes. They should not try to woo their subjects with false hope about the benefits of the research.
“We’re trying to develop a way to engage in those discussions without overselling the knowledge,” said Paul Spicer, an anthropologist at the University of Oklahoma. But if practical good does come from the research — say, a new drug — these communities should also have a way to share the benefits.
The microbiome poses another bioethical balancing act, between the interests of microbe hosts and the public at large. If scientists become too consumed with protecting the individuals they study, research on the microbiome could slow.
Monitoring the bacteria flushed into the sewer system of a town, for instance, might reveal a lot about the entire town’s health. But a regulation requiring permission from every resident of the town would stop the study dead in its tracks.
Indeed, one outcome of the microbiome revolution may be to reorient bioethics itself. “We’re not in this alone,” Professor Rhodes said. “We’re part of the environment and part of the world. Instead of just focusing on protection, we can ask, ‘How can we help people?’ ”
Carl Zimmer writes frequently for The New York Times about science and is the author of “A Planet of Viruses.”

How Microbes Defend and Define Us


How Microbes Defend and Define Us

Allen Brisson-Smith for The New York Times
Dr. Alexander Khoruts, a gastroenterologist at the University Minnesota, used bacteriotherapy to help cure a patient suffering from a gut infection.

Dr. Alexander Khoruts had run out of options.
Multimedia


In 2008, Dr. Khoruts, a gastroenterologist at the University of Minnesota, took on a patient suffering from a vicious gut infection of Clostridium difficile. She was crippled by constant diarrhea, which had left her in a wheelchair wearing diapers. Dr. Khoruts treated her with an assortment of antibiotics, but nothing could stop the bacteria. His patient was wasting away, losing 60 pounds over the course of eight months. “She was just dwindling down the drain, and she probably would have died,” Dr. Khoruts said.
Dr. Khoruts decided his patient needed a transplant. But he didn’t give her a piece of someone else’s intestines, or a stomach, or any other organ. Instead, he gave her some of her husband’s bacteria.
Dr. Khoruts mixed a small sample of her husband’s stool with saline solution and delivered it into her colon. Writing in the Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology last month, Dr. Khoruts and his colleagues reported that her diarrhea vanished in a day. Her Clostridium difficile infection disappeared as well and has not returned since.
The procedure — known as bacteriotherapy or fecal transplantation — had been carried out a few times over the past few decades. But Dr. Khoruts and his colleagues were able to do something previous doctors could not: they took a genetic survey of the bacteria in her intestines before and after the transplant.
Before the transplant, they found, her gut flora was in a desperate state. “The normal bacteria just didn’t exist in her,” said Dr. Khoruts. “She was colonized by all sorts of misfits.”
Two weeks after the transplant, the scientists analyzed the microbes again. Her husband’s microbes had taken over. “That community was able to function and cure her disease in a matter of days,” said Janet Jansson, a microbial ecologist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and a co-author of the paper. “I didn’t expect it to work. The project blew me away.”
Scientists are regularly blown away by the complexity, power, and sheer number of microbes that live in our bodies. “We have over 10 times more microbes than human cells in our bodies,” said George Weinstock of Washington University in St. Louis. But the microbiome, as it’s known, remains mostly a mystery. “It’s as if we have these other organs, and yet these are parts of our bodies we know nothing about.”
Dr. Weinstock is part of an international effort to shed light on those puzzling organs. He and his colleagues are cataloging thousands of new microbe species by gathering their DNA sequences. Meanwhile, other scientists are running experiments to figure out what those microbes are actually doing. They’re finding that the microbiome does a lot to keep us in good health. Ultimately, researchers hope, they will learn enough about the microbiome to enlist it in the fight against diseases.
“In just the last year, it really went from a small cottage industry to the big time,” said David Relman of Stanford University.
The microbiome first came to light in the mid-1600s, when the Dutch lens-grinder Antonie van Leeuwenhoek scraped the scum off his teeth, placed it under a microscope and discovered that it contained swimming creatures. Later generations of microbiologists continued to study microbes from our bodies, but they could only study the ones that could survive in a laboratory. For many species, this exile meant death.
In recent years, scientists have started to survey the microbiome in a new way: by gathering DNA. They scrape the skin or take a cheek swab and pull out the genetic material. Getting the DNA is fairly easy. Sequencing and making sense of it is hard, however, because a single sample may yield millions of fragments of DNA from hundreds of different species.
A number of teams are working together to tackle this problem in a systematic way. Dr. Weinstock is part of the biggest of these initiatives, known as the Human Microbiome Project. The $150 million initiative was started in 2007 by the National Institutes of Health. The project team is gathering samples from 18 different sites on the bodies of 300 volunteers.
To make sense of the genes that they’re gathering, they are sequencing the entire genomes of some 900 species that have been cultivated in the lab. Before the project, scientists had only sequenced about 20 species in the microbiome. In May, the scientists published details on the first 178 genomes. They discovered 29,693 genes that are unlike any known genes. (The entire human genome contains only around 20,000 protein-coding genes.)
“This was quite surprising to us, because these are organisms that have been studied for a long time,” said Karen E. Nelson of the J. Craig Venter Institute in Rockville, Md.
The new surveys are helping scientists understand the many ecosystems our bodies offer microbes. In the mouth alone, Dr. Relman estimates, there are between 500 and 1,000 species. “It hasn’t reached a plateau yet: the more people you look at, the more species you get,” he said. The mouth in turn is divided up into smaller ecosystems, like the tongue, the gums, the teeth. Each tooth—and even each side of each tooth—has a different combination of species.
Scientists are even discovering ecosystems in our bodies where they weren’t supposed to exist. Lungs have traditionally been considered to be sterile because microbiologists have never been able to rear microbes from them. A team of scientists at Imperial College London recently went hunting for DNA instead. Analyzing lung samples from healthy volunteers, they discovered 128 species of bacteria. Every square centimeter of our lungs is home to 2,000 microbes.
Multimedia


Some microbes can only survive in one part of the body, while others are more cosmopolitan. And the species found in one person’s body may be missing from another’s. Out of the 500 to 1,000 species of microbes identified in people’s mouths, for example, only about 100 to 200 live in any one person’s mouth at any given moment. Only 13 percent of the species on two people’s hands are the same. Only 17 percent of the species living on one person’s left hand also live on the right one.
This variation means that the total number of genes in the human microbiome must be colossal. European and Chinese researchers recently catalogued all the microbial genes in stool samples they collected from 124 individuals. In March, they published a list of 3.3 million genes.
The variation in our microbiomes emerges the moment we are born.
“You have a sterile baby coming from a germ-free environment into the world,” said Maria Dominguez-Bello, a microbiologist at the University of Puerto Rico. Recently, she and her colleagues studied how sterile babies get colonized in a hospital in the Venezuelan city of Puerto Ayacucho. They took samples from the bodies of newborns within minutes of birth. They found that babies born vaginally were coated with microbes from their mothers’ birth canals. But babies born by Caesarean section were covered in microbes typically found on the skin of adults.
“Our bet was that the Caesarean section babies were sterile, but it’s like they’re magnets,” said Dr. Dominguez-Bello.
We continue to be colonized every day of our lives. “Surrounding us and infusing us is this cloud of microbes,” said Jeffrey Gordon of Washington University. We end up with different species, but those species generally carry out the same essential chemistry that we need to survive. One of those tasks is breaking down complex plant molecules. “We have a pathetic number of enzymes encoded in the human genome, whereas microbes have a large arsenal,” said Dr. Gordon.
In addition to helping us digest, the microbiome helps us in many other ways. The microbes in our nose, for example, make antibiotics that can kill the dangerous pathogens we sniff. Our bodies wait for signals from microbes in order to fully develop. When scientists rear mice without any germ in their bodies, the mice end up with stunted intestines.
In order to co-exist with our microbiome, our immune system has to be able to tolerate thousands of harmless species, while attacking pathogens. Scientists are finding that the microbiome itself guides the immune system to the proper balance.
One way the immune system fights pathogens is with inflammation. Too much inflammation can be harmful, so we have immune cells that produce inflammation-reducing signals. Last month, Sarkis Mazmanian and June L. Round at Caltech reported that mice reared without a microbiome can’t produce an inflammation-reducing molecule called IL-10.
The scientists then inoculated the mice with a single species of gut bacteria, known as Bacteroides fragilis. Once the bacteria began to breed in the guts of the mice, they produced a signal that was taken up by certain immune cells. In response to the signal, the cells developed the ability to produce IL-10.
Scientists are not just finding new links between the microbiome and our health. They’re also finding that many diseases are accompanied by dramatic changes in the makeup of our inner ecosystems. The Imperial College team that discovered microbes in the lungs, for example, also discovered that people with asthma have a different collection of microbes than healthy people. Obese people also have a different set of species in their guts than people of normal weight.
In some cases, new microbes may simply move into our bodies when disease alters the landscape. In other cases, however, the microbes may help give rise to the disease. Some surveys suggest that babies delivered by Caesarian section are more likely to get skin infections from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. It’s possible that they lack the defensive shield of microbes from their mother’s birth canal.
Caesarean sections have also been linked to an increase in asthma and allergies in children. So have the increased use of antibiotics in the United States and other developed countries. Children who live on farms — where they can get a healthy dose of microbes from the soil — are less prone to getting autoimmune disorders than children who grow up in cities.
Some scientists argue that these studies all point to the same conclusion: when children are deprived of their normal supply of microbes, their immune systems get a poor education. In some people, untutored immune cells become too eager to unleash a storm of inflammation. Instead of killing off invaders, they only damage the host’s own body.
A better understanding of the microbiome might give doctors a new way to fight some of these diseases. For more than a century, scientists have been investigating how to treat patients with beneficial bacteria. But probiotics, as they’re sometimes called, have only had limited success. The problem may lie in our ignorance of precisely how most microbes in our bodies affect our health.
Dr. Khoruts and his colleagues have carried out 15 more fecal transplants, 13 of which cured their patients. They’re now analyzing the microbiome of their patients to figure out precisely which species are wiping out the Clostridium difficile infections. Instead of a crude transplant, Dr. Khoruts hopes that eventually he can give his patients what he jokingly calls “God’s probiotic” — a pill containing microbes whose ability to fight infections has been scientifically validated.
Dr. Weinstock, however, warns that a deep understanding of the microbiome is a long way off.
“In terms of hard-boiled science, we’re falling short of the mark,” he said. A better picture of the microbiome will only emerge once scientists can use the genetic information Dr. Weinstock and his colleagues are gathering to run many more experiments.
“It’s just old-time science. There are no short-cuts around that,” he said.
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: July 21, 2010
An article on July 13 about new research on the role of microbes in the human body misstated part of the name of a bacterium linked to skin infections in babies delivered by Caesarean section. It is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, not “multiply resistant.”